Social Democracy Inside Out
Social Democracy Inside Out
复制标题
社会民主主义由内而外
DOI：
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216352.001.0001
复制
发表时间：
2007
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
David Rueda
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
David Rueda
本书的分析反驳了对工业化民主国家的比较政治经济学的根深蒂固的解释。它尤其质疑社会民主党政府将捍卫劳工利益的普遍假设。有证据表明，劳动力已分成两个明显不同的群体：有稳定就业的群体（内部人）和没有稳定就业的群体（外部人）。这本书着重于三个政策领域：就业保护（代表内部人士的主要关切），以及积极和消极的劳动力市场政策（外部人士的主要关切）。这一论点的主旨是，社会民主党的目标往往是通过追求只有利于内部人士的政策来实现的。这本书的内部-外部模型的含义是，社会民主政府与更高层次的就业保护立法有关，而与劳动力市场政策无关。这本书还认为，有一些因素可以减少内部和外部的差异，并削弱他们对社会民主政府的影响。这些假设是通过不同方法的三角测量来探讨的。这本书提供了调查和宏观数据的分析和三个案例研究的详细比较：西班牙，英国和荷兰。
The analysis in this book disputes entrenched interpretations of the comparative political economy of industrialized democracies. It questions, in particular, the widely-held assumption that social democratic governments will defend the interests of labour. The evidence shows that labour has become split into two clearly differentiated constituencies: those with secure employment (insiders) and those without (outsiders). The book focuses on three policy areas: employment protection (representing the main concern of insiders), and active and passive labour market policies (the main concern of outsiders). The main thrust of the argument is that the goals of social democratic parties are often best served by pursuing policies that benefit only insiders. The implication of the book's insider-outsider model is that social democratic government is associated with higher levels of employment protection legislation but not with labour market policy. The book also argues that there are factors that can reduce insideroutsider differences and weaken their influence on social democratic governments. These hypotheses are explored through the triangulation of different methodologies. The book provides an analysis of surveys and macrodata and a detailed comparison of three case-studies: Spain, the UK, and the Netherlands.