Recommendations for Mass Spectrometry Data Quality Metrics for Open Access Data (Corollary to the Amsterdam Principles)
Recommendations for Mass Spectrometry Data Quality Metrics for Open Access Data (Corollary to the Amsterdam Principles)
复制标题
DOI：
10.1021/pr201071t
复制
发表时间：
2012-02-01
影响因子：
4.4
通讯作者：
Rodriguez, Henry
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kinsinger, Christopher R.;Apffel, James;Rodriguez, Henry
支持蛋白质组学数据快速和开放共享的政策正在由该领域的领先期刊实施。蛋白质组学界正在采取措施，确保数据可公开获取，并具有高质量，这是一项具有挑战性的任务，需要开发和部署用于测量和记录数据质量指标的方法。2010年9月18日，美国国家癌症研究所（NCI）在澳大利亚悉尼召开了“蛋白质组学数据质量评估国际研讨会”，以确定和解决开发和使用开放获取蛋白质组学数据的方法所面临的问题。研讨会上的利益相关者列举了质谱数据质量评估框架的关键原则，该框架将满足研究界、期刊、资助机构和数据存储库的需求。与会者讨论并同意广泛使用质量度量的两个主要需求：（1）不断发展的综合质量度量列表和（2）伴随软件分析的标准。与会者强调了增加教育和培训计划以促进蛋白质组学可靠协议的重要性。本研讨会报告探讨了提高开放获取数据质量的历史先例、关键讨论和必要的后续步骤。根据协议，这篇文章同时发表在蛋白质组学研究杂志，分子和细胞蛋白质组学，蛋白质组学和蛋白质组学临床应用，作为对研究界的公共服务。同行评议过程是由期刊选择的一组裁判进行的协调努力。
Policies supporting the rapid and open sharing of proteomic data are being implemented by the leading journals in the field. The proteomics community is taking steps to ensure that data are made publicly accessible and are of high quality, a challenging task that requires the development and deployment of methods for measuring and documenting data quality metrics. On September 18, 2010, the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) convened the "International Workshop on Proteomic Data Quality Metrics" in Sydney, Australia, to identify and address issues facing the development and use of such methods for open access proteomics data. The stakeholders at the workshop enumerated the key principles underlying a framework for data quality assessment in mass spectrometry data that will meet the needs of the research community, journals, funding agencies, and data repositories. Attendees discussed and agreed up on two primary needs for the wide use of quality metrics: (1) an evolving list of comprehensive quality metrics and (2) standards accompanied by software analytics. Attendees stressed the importance of increased education and training programs to promote reliable protocols in proteomics. This workshop report explores the historic precedents, key discussions, and necessary next steps to enhance the quality of open access data. By agreement, this article is published simultaneously in the Journal of Proteome Research, Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, Proteomics, and Proteomics Clinical Applications as a public service to the research community. The peer review process was a coordinated effort conducted by a panel of referees selected by the journals.