The good, the bad and the ugly: framing debates on nature in a One Health community
The good, the bad and the ugly: framing debates on nature in a One Health community
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11625-019-00674-z
复制
发表时间：
2019-11-01
影响因子：
6
通讯作者：
Vanhove, Maarten P. M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Antoine-Moussiaux, Nicolas;de Bisthoven, Luc Janssens;Vanhove, Maarten P. M.
同一健康概念起源于医学和兽医领域，是对这些学科或专业与环境和社会科学之间合作的公开呼吁。然而，由于各种因素，所讨论的实践界表现出不安或不发达的合作。我们认为，一个重要的因素是提出问题和提出问题的方式，即问题的框架。基于对健康和知识的互补观点，这篇综述提供了一个跨学科和跨学科的分析，如科学文献所揭示的那样，在一个健康话语中，框架>；作为合作的障碍或促进者。我们发现，科学家缺乏对其运作框架的反思，似乎是学科之间误解的一个主要因素，也是跨学科解决方案改善健康风险和效益管理的障碍。因此，要建立这样的解决方案，框架必须是这一过程中有意识和重复的步骤，承认和解释观点和价值观的多样性。这一过程中固有的跨学科对话促进了科学领域、政策制定者和公民之间的交流，对与自然有关的健康风险和益处的各种框架采取了关键但多元的办法，并深刻认识到其实际和伦理后果。
Originating in medical and veterinary spheres, the One Health concept stands as an open call for collaboration also between these disciplines or professions and those of environmental and social science. However, the communities of practice in question show uneasy or under-developed collaborations, due to a variety of factors. We argue that an important factor is the way issues are raised and questions are formulated, i.e., their framing. Based on complementary perspectives on health and knowledge, this overview provides an inter- and trans-disciplinary analysis of the role of the framing of > in One Health discourses as a barrier or a facilitator to collaboration, as revealed by the scientific literature. We find that the lack of reflection by scientists about the framing under which they operate appears as a major factor of misunderstanding between disciplines, and a barrier for inter- and trans-disciplinary solutions to improve management of health risks and benefits. Hence, to build such solutions, framing will have to be a conscious and repeated step in the process, acknowledging and explaining the diversity of viewpoints and values. The interdisciplinary dialogues inherent in this process promote translation between scientific domains, policy-makers and citizens, with a critical but pluralistic recourse to various framings of health risks and benefits associated with nature, and a deep awareness of their practical and ethical consequences.