Strategic Planning Research: Toward a Theory-Driven Agenda

Strategic Planning Research: Toward a Theory-Driven Agenda
复制标题

战略规划研究:走向理论驱动的议程

DOI:
10.1177/0149206313478185
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
13.5
通讯作者:
S. Floyd
S. Floyd
中科院分区:
管理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Carola Wolf;S. Floyd

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

这篇评论结合了30多年来进行的战略规划研究,范围从战略规划的经典模型到最近的实证工作,如减少管理人员的职位偏见和协调子单位的活动。以前的评论没有更多的社会化的观点,发展在应对明茨伯格的批评规划,包括研究计划的出现和战略作为实践的方法。为了刺激对战略规划的研究兴趣的复苏,本文借鉴了不同的理论体系,超越了直到20世纪90年代中期这一领域研究的理性设计和应急方法。我们开发了一个广泛的战略规划概念,并确定未来的研究机会,以提高我们的战略规划如何影响组织成果的理解。我们的框架包括战略规划从业者的作用;战略规划的基本惯例、规范和程序(实践);以及规划者的具体活动(实践)。
This review incorporates strategic planning research conducted over more than 30 years and ranges from the classical model of strategic planning to recent empirical work on intermediate outcomes, such as the reduction of managers’ position bias and the coordination of subunit activity. Prior reviews have not had the benefit of more socialized perspectives that developed in response to Mintzberg’s critique of planning, including research on planned emergence and strategy-as-practice approaches. To stimulate a resurgence of research interest on strategic planning, this review therefore draws on a diverse body of theory beyond the rational design and contingency approaches that characterized research in this domain until the mid-1990s. We develop a broad conceptualization of strategic planning and identify future research opportunities for improving our understanding of how strategic planning influences organizational outcomes. Our framework incorporates the role of strategic planning practitioners; the underlying routines, norms, and procedures of strategic planning (practices); and the concrete activities of planners (praxis).
战略作为实践:研究方向和资源
DOI: --
发表时间: 2007
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
Johnson
通讯作者: Johnson