Do Core Interpersonal and Affective Traits of PCL-R Psychopathy Interact With Antisocial Behavior and Disinhibition to Predict Violence?
Do Core Interpersonal and Affective Traits of PCL-R Psychopathy Interact With Antisocial Behavior and Disinhibition to Predict Violence?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/a0019618
复制
发表时间：
2010-09-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Camp, Jacqueline
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kennealy, Patrick J.;Skeem, Jennifer L.;Camp, Jacqueline
心理变态测量在预测暴力方面的效用在很大程度上是通过他们对社会偏差的评估来解释的（例如，反社会行为;抑制解除）。一个关键的问题是，社会偏差是否与精神病患者的核心人际情感特征相互作用，以预测暴力。核心精神病特征是否会使那些有严重不良行为史的不受约束的人（已经很高的）暴力风险成倍增加？这项对32个效应量（N = 10,555）的荟萃分析测试了精神病检查表修订版（PCL-R; R。D.人际情感和社会偏差量表预测暴力超出了每个量表的简单加性效应。结果表明，社会越轨是更独特的预测暴力（d = .40）比人际情感特质（d = .11），这两个规模不相互作用（d = .00），以增加预测暴力的权力。事实上，在81%和96%的研究中，单独的社会越轨比人际情感量表和任何互动都能更好地预测。这些发现对风险评估和精神病的一些概念化的理论意义具有基本的实践意义。
The utility of psychopathy measures in predicting violence is largely explained by their assessment of social deviance (e.g., antisocial behavior; disinhibition). A key question is whether social deviance interacts with the core interpersonal-affective traits of psychopathy to predict violence. Do core psychopathic traits multiply the (already high) risk of violence among disinhibited individuals with a dense history of misbehavior? This meta-analysis of 32 effect sizes (N = 10,555) tested whether an interaction between the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; R. D. Hare, 2003) Interpersonal-Affective and Social Deviance scales predicted violence beyond the simple additive effects of each scale. Results indicate that Social Deviance is more uniquely predictive of violence (d = .40) than Interpersonal-Affective traits (d = .11), and these two scales do not interact (d = .00) to increase power in predicting violence. In fact, Social Deviance alone would predict better than the Interpersonal-Affective scale and any interaction in 81% and 96% of studies, respectively. These findings have fundamental practical implications for risk assessment and theoretical implications for some conceptualizations of psychopathy.