DNA and the Fourth Amendment: Would a Defendant Succeed on a Challenge to a Familial DNA Search?
DNA and the Fourth Amendment: Would a Defendant Succeed on a Challenge to a Familial DNA Search?
复制标题
DNA 和第四修正案:被告能否成功挑战家族 DNA 搜索?
DOI:
10.1177/0098858819892746
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
0.6
通讯作者:
Elaine Ortyl
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Elaine Ortyl
A new Deoxyribonucleic Acid (“DNA”) analysis tool has gained popularity among law enforcement agencies: familial DNA searching.1 Unlike typical DNA testing, familial DNA searching compares areas of hereditary sections of DNA — genetic markers that are passed down through family lines. As a result, familial DNA searching allows law enforcement agencies to take unknown DNA from crime scenes and find potential family members by looking for hereditary markers. Recently, familial DNA has been in the spotlight because investigators in California successfully used familial DNA searching to solve the Golden State Killer cold case.2 Familial DNA searching is a relatively new investigative tool, therefore state and federal courts have not ruled on its constitutionality. However, based upon the current Fourth Amendment precedents, the Supreme Court is likely to find that familial DNA searching is constitutional. DNA testing has significantly improved since its introduction in the mid1980s.3 Technology that was once only available in the most advanced laboratories is now readily available to the public.4 For example, companies like 23andMe and Ancestry.com market and sell DNA tests to the public at large; all a person has to do is buy a kit for $99, spit into a tube, and send their sample to a lab.5 After analyzing the DNA, the company generates a report telling the individual the ancestral origins of their