Proposed norms for the Glasgow hearing-aid benefit profile (Ghabp) questionnaire.
Proposed norms for the Glasgow hearing-aid benefit profile (Ghabp) questionnaire.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3109/14992027.2013.876110
复制
发表时间：
2014-05
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Akeroyd MA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Whitmer WM;Howell P;Akeroyd MA
从一个大型区域数据集中形成一套对GHABP问卷的规范性答复。参与者被要求对他们的听力残疾，残疾，助听器（HA）的使用，HA的好处，HA的满意度和残余（辅助）残疾的五点量表四种情况下：安静的谈话，电视（TV）听，嘈杂的谈话和小组对话。一部分参与者还估计了在这些情况下花费的时间。1574名正常至深听阈的成年人参与了研究。有一个显着的关系，增加感知残疾和增加听力损失的更好的耳朵听力平均值（AUR）。HA措施的反应并没有很大的差异与听力损失：HA的使用被报告为高，而剩余残疾，HA的好处和满意度都被报告为中等平均。结果可以用作标准数据集，用于评估临床中的个体反应，其中GHABP提供了一个有用的简短问卷来吸引患者。助听器相关反应缺乏系统性变化，这表明放大所带来的好处还有改进的余地。
To form a normative set of responses to the GHABP questionnaire from a large regional dataset. Participants were asked to rate their hearing disability, handicap, hearing-aid (HA) use, HA benefit, HA satisfaction and residual (aided) disability on a five-point scale for four situations: quiet conversation, television (TV) listening, noisy conversation and group conversation. A subset of participants also estimated the time spent in these situations. 1574 adults with normal to profound hearing thresholds participated. There was a significant relationship between increasing perceived disability and increasing hearing loss as given by the better-ear audiometric average (BEA). Responses for HA measures did not vary greatly with hearing loss: HA use was reported as high, whereas residual disability, HA benefit and satisfaction were all reported on average as moderate. The results can be used as a normative dataset with which to evaluate individual responses in the clinic, where the GHABP provides a useful short-form questionnaire to engage the patient. The lack of systematic changes in hearing-aid related responses shows room for improvement in the benefit afforded by amplification.