The relationship between contract type and job satisfaction in a mediated moderation model: The role of job insecurity and psychological contract violation
The relationship between contract type and job satisfaction in a mediated moderation model: The role of job insecurity and psychological contract violation
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0143831x14546238
复制
发表时间：
2016-05-01
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
Chirumbolo, Antonio
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Callea, Antonino;Urbini, Flavio;Chirumbolo, Antonio
在过去的几十年里，对合同类型，工作不安全感和结果之间的关系的研究一直在不断增加。先前的证据表明，工作不安全感缓和合同类型（永久与临时）对工作满意度的影响。本研究的目的是探讨这些关系考虑两个方面（内在和外在）的工作满意度和心理契约违背作为中介，在中介调节模型。参加者是意大利不同组织的638名雇员，有无限期合同或定期合同。结果表明，工作不安全感对契约类型与内在和外在工作满意度之间的关系具有不同的调节作用。工作不安全感的影响更消极的永久性工人的内在工作满意度和更消极的临时工的外在工作满意度。中介调节分析支持了研究的主要假设，指出心理契约违背负向介导了交互效应。
In the last decades, research on the relationship between contract type, job insecurity and outcomes has been constantly increasing. Previous evidence indicated that job insecurity moderates the impact of contract type (permanent vs temporary) on job satisfaction. The present study aims to investigate these relationships considering two facets (intrinsic and extrinsic) of job satisfaction and psychological contract violation as mediator, in the mediated moderation model. Participants were 638 employees of different Italian organizations, with open-ended or fixed-term contract. As hypothesized, results indicated that job insecurity moderates the relationship between contract type and intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction differently for contract type. The job insecurity effects were more negative for permanent workers regarding intrinsic job satisfaction and more negative for temporary workers regarding extrinsic job satisfaction. The mediated moderation analyses supported the study's main hypothesis, pointing out that psychological contract violation negatively mediated the interaction effects.