Globalized-In-Security: the Field and the Ban-Opticon
Globalized-In-Security: the Field and the Ban-Opticon
复制标题
安全全球化：领域和禁令光学
DOI：
10.4324/9780203926765-7
复制
发表时间：
2008
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
D. Bigo
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Bigo
美国及其最亲密的盟友2提出的主张全球化安全的必要性的论述已经具有前所未有的强度和范围。他们通过宣传全球“（不）安全”的概念为自己辩护，认为这是由于大规模毁灭性威胁的发展，被认为来自恐怖主义或其他犯罪组织以及支持他们的政府。这种全球化应该使国家边界实际上过时，并迫使国际竞技场的其他行为者进行合作。与此同时，它使战争、国防、国际秩序和战略这一系列问题与犯罪、国内安全、公共秩序和警察调查这一系列问题之间的传统区别变得过时。进一步加剧这种趋势的是，自9月11日以来，
T discourses that the United States and its closest allies 2 have put forth asserting the necessity to globalize security have taken on an unprecedented intensity and reach. They justify themselves by propagating the idea of a global “(in)security,” attributed to the development of threats of mass destruction, thought to derive from terrorist or other criminal organizations and the governments that support them. This globalization is supposed to make national borders effectively obsolete, and to oblige other actors in the international arena to collaborate. At the same time, it makes obsolete the conventional distinction between the constellation of war, defence, international order and strategy, and another constellation of crime, internal security, public order and police investigations. Exacerbating this tendency yet further is the fact that, since September 11,