Performing International Systems: Two East-Asian Alternatives to the Westphalian Order
Performing International Systems: Two East-Asian Alternatives to the Westphalian Order
复制标题
执行国际体系：威斯特伐利亚秩序的两种东亚替代方案
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
影响因子：
7.8
通讯作者：
Erik Ringmar
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Erik Ringmar
本文为国际体系的比较研究提供了一个框架。通过分析国际体系是如何构建、编写和执行的，可以理解国家间关系在不同历史时期和世界不同地区是如何被解释的。但这样的调查也有普遍的含义，阿利亚是对权力的性质，情绪在外交决策中的作用，以及公众舆论的形成的研究。案例研究由中国中心，德川，威斯特伐利亚系统提供。正如本研究所显示的，两种东亚体系在若干方面比威斯特伐利亚体系更能适应21世纪世纪的国际政治现实。
Abstract This article provides a framework for the comparative study of international systems. By analyzing how international systems are framed, scripted, and performed, it is possible to understand how interstate relations are interpreted in different historical periods and parts of the world. But such an investigation also has general implications—inter alia for a study of the nature of power, the role of emotions in foreign policymaking, and public opinion formation. Case studies are provided by the Sino-centric, the Tokugawa, and the Westphalian systems. As this study shows, the two East Asian systems were in several respects better adapted than the Westphalian to the realities of international politics in the twenty-first century.