A Review & Analysis of Mindfulness Research in HCI: Framing Current Lines of Research and Future Opportunities

A Review & Analysis of Mindfulness Research in HCI: Framing Current Lines of Research and Future Opportunities
复制标题

回顾

DOI:
10.1145/3290605.3300687
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Schraefel
M. Schraefel
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Nada Terzimehic;Renate Häuslschmid;H. Hussmann;M. Schraefel

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

正念是一个在人机交互文献中出现频率越来越高的术语,然而这个术语本身的使用几乎和它出现的论文数量一样多。这种多样性使得围绕正念或理解设计空间本身来比较或评估HCI方法成为一项具有挑战性的任务。我们进行了一个结构化的ACM文献检索的基础上,长期正念。我们的选择过程产生了38篇相关论文,我们分析了它们的定义,动机,实践,评估和正念技术的使用。我们确定了每个方面的相似性,分歧和感兴趣的领域,从而形成了一个由四个视角和七条研究路线组成的框架。我们强调未来人机交互研究和设计的挑战和机遇。
Mindfulness is a term seen with increasing frequency in HCI literature, and yet the term itself is used almost as variously as the number of papers in which it appears. This diversity makes comparing or evaluating HCI approaches around mindfulness or understanding the design space itself a challenging task. We conducted a structured ACM literature search based on the term mindfulness. Our selection process yielded 38 relevant papers, which we analyzed for their definition, motivation, practice, evaluation and technology use around mindfulness. We identify similarities, divergences and areas of interest for each aspect, resulting in a framework composed of four perspectives and seven lines of research. We highlight challenges and opportunities for future HCI research and design.