Understanding institutional dynamics in participatory governance: how rules, practices and narratives combine to produce stability or diverge to create conditions for change
Understanding institutional dynamics in participatory governance: how rules, practices and narratives combine to produce stability or diverge to create conditions for change
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/19460171.2021.1984265
复制
发表时间：
2021-10-02
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
Salazar, Yunailis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Blanco, Ismael;Lowndes, Vivien;Salazar, Yunailis
在影响决策者和公民行为的程度上，干预性治理已经制度化。不改变既定行为的参与政策即使有影响，也是有限的。但参与性治理制度化的机制是什么？本文以巴塞罗那为例，分析了正式规则、非正式实践和叙事之间的关系。借鉴90访谈，本文认为，在新自由主义紧缩的背景下，正式的规则证明了令人惊讶的弹性，但非正式的做法和叙述变得越来越不一致的民间社会行为者开发创新的方法和更坚持的要求。这些新颖的非正式实践和叙事随后支撑了与2015-2019年巴塞罗那恩库姆政府相关的参与式治理的复兴。本文对稳定和变革的驱动因素做出了理论和实践贡献。虽然正式规则可能会随着时间的推移而持续存在，但参与性治理的活力取决于规则、做法和叙述之间的关系。
Participatory governance is institutionalised to the extent that it shapes the behaviour of decision-makers and citizens. Participation policies that do not change established behaviour have limited, if any, impact. But what are the mechanisms whereby participatory governance becomes institutionalised? Using a case study of Barcelona, the paper analyses the relationship between formal rules, informal practices and narratives. Drawing on 90 interviews, the paper argues that in the context of neoliberal austerity formal rules proved surprisingly resilient, but informal practices and narratives became increasingly dis-aligned as civil society actors developed innovative approaches and more insistent demands. These novel informal practices and narratives subsequently underpinned the renaissance in participatory governance associated with the 2015-2019 Barcelona en Comb government. The paper makes theoretical and practical contributions regarding the drivers of stability and change. While formal rules may endure over time, dynamism in participatory governance depends upon the relationship between rules, practices and narratives.