Adolescent Perceptions of Parental Privacy Invasion and Adolescent Secrecy: An Illustration of Simpson's Paradox

Adolescent Perceptions of Parental Privacy Invasion and Adolescent Secrecy: An Illustration of Simpson's Paradox
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/cdev.13002
复制
发表时间:
2018-11-01
期刊:
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Keijsers, Loes
Keijsers, Loes
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dietvorst, Evelien;Hiemstra, Marieke;Keijsers, Loes

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

青少年的秘密与将父母的行为视为侵犯隐私的行为交织在一起。然而,目前尚未测试这种交易过程如何在人体内层面(这些因果过程发生的地方)运作。荷兰青少年(n = 244,M 年龄 = 13.84,38.50% 为男孩)三次报告认为父母侵犯隐私和保密。交叉滞后面板模型(CLPM)证实了早期的发现。隐私侵犯预示着保密性的增加,但发现保密性增加与隐私侵犯的增加存在相反的影响。通过一种新颖的随机截距 CLPM 来控制混杂的组级正相关性,发现了人体内的负相关性。保密程度越高,人与人之间的隐私侵犯行为就越低。这些人体内与人之间相反的发现说明了辛普森悖论。
Adolescents' secrecy is intertwined with perception of parents' behaviors as acts of privacy invasion. It is currently untested, however, how this transactional process operates at the within-person level-where these causal processes take place. Dutch adolescents (n = 244, M-age = 13.84, 38.50% boys) reported three times on perceived parental privacy invasion and secrecy. Cross-lagged panel models (CLPM) confirmed earlier findings. Privacy invasion predicted increased secrecy, but a reverse effect was found from increased secrecy to increased privacy invasion. Controlling for confounding positive group-level associations with a novel random intercept CLPM, negative within-person associations were found. Higher levels of secrecy predicted lower levels of privacy invasive behaviors at the within-person level. These opposing findings within- versus between-persons illustrate a Simpson's paradox.