Assistive Technology Use and Stigma
Assistive Technology Use and Stigma
复制标题
辅助技术的使用和耻辱
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Scherer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Parette;M. Scherer
与污名相关的问题及其对发育障碍者使用辅助技术(AT)的影响被讨论。虽然污名与残疾的存在有关已知多年，但污名与AT使用之间的关系，特别是在与不同文化的家庭一起工作时，才刚刚开始研究。AT决策团队面临的与污名相关的问题包括家庭对AT的期望、在公共环境中使用AT所产生的可见度，以及认为如果儿童依赖设备就不会获得重要的发展技能。虽然已经在现场实施了许多用于AT决策的方法，但与这些方法相关的有效性和可靠性数据的缺乏强调了了解与AT使用相关的污名的潜在影响的重要性。可能导致污名化的具体领域包括(A)设备美学/美容，(B)性别和年龄适当性，(C)社会可接受性，(D)升华和职业尊重，(E)教师和对残疾的接受，以及(F)普遍设计原则。指出了未来探索污名和政府政策以及对AT决策的影响的研究的重要性。
Issues related to stigma and its impact on assistive technology (AT) use with persons having developmental disabilities are addressed. While stigma has been known to be associated with presence of disability for many years, relationship between stigma and AT usage, particularly when working with families across cultures, has only just begun to be examined. Issues confronted by AT decision-making teams related to stigma include family expectations of AT, visibility resulting from use of AT in public settings, and perceptions that children will not attain important developmental skills if they become reliant on devices. While numerous approaches for AT decision-making have been implemented in the field, absence of validity and reliability data related to such approaches emphasizes importance of understanding potential influences of stigma associated with AT use. Specific areas that can contribute to stigmatization include (a) device aesthetics/cosmesis, (b) gender and age appropriateness, (c) social acceptability, (d) sublimation and professional deference, (e) teachers and acceptance of disability, and (f) universal design principles. Importance of future research that explores stigma and government policy and impact on AT decision-making is noted.
社会文化因素塑造技术的使用：履行承诺。
影响因子：
0.5
作者：
Luborsky,MarkR
通讯作者：
Luborsky,MarkR