More on the structure of male role norms - Exploratory and multiple sample confirmatory analyses
More on the structure of male role norms - Exploratory and multiple sample confirmatory analyses
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00147.x
复制
发表时间：
1998-06-01
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Snell, AF
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fischer, AR;Tokar, DM;Snell, AF
本研究使用了来自两所大型公立大学(一所中西部大学，一所中东部大学)的四个样本(总N=656)的数据，评估了男性意识形态的一种广泛使用的测量工具--男性角色规范量表(Thompson&Pleck，1986)的结构。探索性因素分析表明，探索性样本(样本1；N=210)的数据符合四因素模型。这四个因素是地位/理性、反女性、强硬形象和暴力强硬。对验证样本(样本2、3和4；N=446)进行了一系列验证性因素分析，检验了基于理论(即Brannon，1976)和先前研究(即Thompson&Pleck，1986)的四个模型。研究1的探索性分析结果表明，从研究1中的探索性样本得到的四因素模型对所有模型的验证样本数据提供了最好的拟合，并且根据几个模型数据拟合指数，在绝对值方面也提供了很好的拟合。最后，本文讨论了对男性意识评估的启示以及对未来研究的建议。
This study assessed the structure of a widely used measure of masculinity ideology, the Male Role Norms Scale (Thompson & Pleck, 1986), using data from four samples of male college students (total N = 656) at two large, public universities (one Midwestern, one Eastern-Central). Exploratory factor analysis suggested a four-factor model best fit the data in the exploratory sample (sample 1; N = 210). The four factors were Status/Rationality, Antifemininity, Tough Image, and Violent Toughness. A series of confirmatory factor analyses on a validation sample (samples 2, 3, and 4; N = 446), tested four models based on theory (i.e., Brannon, 1976) and previous research (i.e., Thompson & Pleck, 1986). Results from Study 1, our exploratory analysis, indicated that the four-factor model derived from the exploratory sample in Study 1 provided the best fit for the validation sample data of all models tested and also provided a good fit in absolute terms, according to several model-data fit indices. Implications for the assessment of masculinity ideology and suggestions for future research are discussed.