Colour violence, deadly geographies, and the meanings of “race” in Brazil

Colour violence, deadly geographies, and the meanings of “race” in Brazil
复制标题

颜色暴力、致命地理以及巴西“种族”的含义

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Luisa Farah Schwartzman
Luisa Farah Schwartzman
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Luisa Farah Schwartzman

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文利用具有全国代表性的调查数据,分析了巴西“种族”与暴力受害、“种族”与支持暴力社会控制实践之间的关系。我的出发点是“种族”是一组相关的实践,而不是有界限的“种族群体”。我通过三角测量“种族”的三种测量方法——自我认同的“人口普查种族”、受访者认同的肤色和市政当局的种族构成——结合阶级、性别和空间的测量方法,来操作这种对“种族”的关系理解。我发现白人地理空间的暴力受害总体水平较低,但采访者认为,在这些白人地理空间中,深色皮肤的人受到的伤害不成比例。控制其他变量,自我认定的人口普查种族与暴力受害无关。我发现,如果考虑到人们与种族、性别、阶级和空间类别和等级的同时关系,就能最好地理解公众对暴力行为的支持。
ABSTRACT This paper analyses the relationships between “race” and violent victimization, and between “race” and support for violent practices of social control in Brazil, using nationally representative survey data. I start from the premise that “race” is a set of relational practices rather than bounded “racial groups”. I operationalize this relational understanding of “race” methodologically by triangulating three measures of “race” – self-identified “census race”, interviewer-identified skin colour, and racial composition of the municipality – in conjunction with measures of class, gender and space. I find that whiter geographic spaces have lower overall levels of violent victimization, but that interviewer-identified darker-skinned individuals are disproportionately victimized in these whiter geographic spaces. Controlling for other variables, self-identified census race is not correlated with violent victimization. I find that public support for violent practices can best be understood by considering people’s simultaneous relationships to race, gender, class and spatial categories and hierarchies.