Does human-AI collaboration lead to more creative art? Aesthetic evaluation of human-made and AI-generated haiku poetry
Does human-AI collaboration lead to more creative art? Aesthetic evaluation of human-made and AI-generated haiku poetry
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.chb.2022.107502
复制
发表时间：
2022-10-22
影响因子：
9.9
通讯作者：
Nomura, Michio
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hitsuwari, Jimpei;Ueda, Yoshiyuki;Nomura, Michio
随着技术的发展，人工智能生成文本的质量不断提高。这与人工智能艺术领域相关，人工智能产生受赞赏的文学或诗歌。这项研究比较了人造俳句和人工智能生成的俳句（由 17 个音节和世界上最短、最清晰的规则组成），以考察对人工智能艺术的审美评价和人们对其的信念。人工智能生成的俳句分为有人工干预的俳句和没有人工干预的俳句。 385 名参与者完成了两项任务。第一个涉及评估人造和人工智能生成的俳句的 21 个项目，例如美感。第二个涉及确定俳句是人造的还是人工智能生成的。结果表明，经过人工干预的人工智能生成俳句的美观度最高，而人工生成的俳句和未经人工干预的人工智能生成俳句的美观度相当。此外，参与者无法区分人造俳句和人工智能生成的俳句。这些结果表明，人机协作在俳句制作中具有更好的创造力。此外，人工智能生成的俳句中的辨别力表现和美感评分之间存在负相关，这表明高质量的人工智能生成的作品被认为是人类创作的。这项研究表明了人类与人工智能在俳句中协作的潜力，以及由于算法厌恶而对人工智能艺术的低估。
With the development of technology, the quality of AI-generated text has improved. This is relevant in the AI art field, where AI generates literature or poetry that is appreciated. This study compared human-made and AI -generated haiku poetry, which is composed with 17 syllables and the world's shortest and clearest rules, to examine aesthetic evaluations of AI art and people's beliefs about it. AI-generated haiku were divided into those with and without human intervention. Two tasks were completed by 385 participants. The first involved eval-uating human-made and AI-generated haiku on 21 items, such as beauty. The second involved determining whether the haiku were human-made or AI-generated. The results showed that the beauty rating of the AI -generated haiku with the human intervention was the highest, and those of the human-made and AI -generated haiku without human intervention were equal. Furthermore, participants could not distinguish be-tween human-made and AI-generated haiku. These results suggest that human-AI collaboration has better creativity in haiku production. Moreover, a negative correlation was found between discrimination performance and beauty rating in AI-generated haiku, suggesting that high-quality AI-generated work is believed to be human -made. This study indicates the potential of human-AI collaboration in haiku and the underestimation of AI art due to algorithm aversion.