The Interplay between Creativity Issues and Design Theories: A New Perspective for Design Management Studies?
The Interplay between Creativity Issues and Design Theories: A New Perspective for Design Management Studies?
复制标题
创造力问题与设计理论之间的相互作用：设计管理研究的新视角？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
B. Weil
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Le Masson;A. Hatchuel;B. Weil
在这篇文章中，我们分析了创造性问题和设计理论之间的关系。虽然这两个概念似乎对应于不同的学术领域（心理学，认知科学和管理的创造力;工程科学和逻辑的设计理论），他们似乎是深刻的联系，当涉及到设计方法和管理。浅析设计理论建设的三个历史性时刻（19世纪50年代，德国工业升级的比率方法，20世纪的系统设计，以及20世纪20年代的包豪斯理论），我们指出了联系创造力和设计理论的辩证相互作用，围绕着“固定效应”的概念：创造力确定了固定效应，这成为新的设计理论的目标;设计理论发明了思维模式来克服它们;反过来，这些设计理论也可以创造新的固定效应，然后由创造力研究指定。这种辩证的相互作用导致了管理设计的新方法的定期发明，即，管理设计活动的知识、流程和组织的新方法。我们使用这个框架来分析创意和设计理论的最新趋势。
In this article, we analyse the relationship between creativity issues and design theory. Although these two notions seem to correspond to different academic fields (psychology, cognitive science and management for creativity; engineering science and logic for design theory), they appear to be deeply related when it comes to design methods and management. Analysing three historical moments in design theory building (the 1850s, with the ratio method for industrial upgrading in Germany, the 20th century with systematic design, and the 1920s with the Bauhaus theory), we point to the dialectical interplay that links creativity and design theory, structured around the notion of ‘fixation effect’: creativity identifies fixation effects, which become the targets of new design theories; design theories invent models of thought to overcome them; and, in turn, these design theories can also create new fixation effects that will then be designated by creativity studies. This dialectical interplay leads to regular inventions of new ways of managing design, i.e., new ways of managing knowledge, processes and organizations for design activities. We use this framework to analyse recent trends in creativity and design theories.