Overcoming the challenges of public data archiving for citizen science biodiversity recording and monitoring schemes
Overcoming the challenges of public data archiving for citizen science biodiversity recording and monitoring schemes
复制标题
克服公民科学生物多样性记录和监测计划的公共数据归档挑战
DOI：
10.1111/1365-2664.13180
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
5.7
通讯作者：
Jeremy D. Wilson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Pearce‐Higgins;S. Baillie;K. Boughey;N. Bourn;R. Foppen;S. Gillings;R. Gregory;T. Hunt;F. Jiguet;A. Lehikoinen;A. Musgrove;R. A. Robinson;D. Roy;G. Siriwardena;K. Walker;Jeremy D. Wilson
公共数据归档（PDA）被广泛提倡作为实现开放数据标准的一种手段，从而改善数据保存，提高科学可重复性和透明度，以及额外的数据使用。公共数据存档最初是为了存档来自短期、单一目的科学研究的数据。它现在被更广泛地应用，包括大规模的公民科学生物多样性记录和监测计划，这些计划联合收割机了志愿者和专业科学家的努力。这可能会减少来自数据和分析服务的收入，从而影响这些计划的财务安全。计划组织者和研究人员之间的沟通可能会中断，降低科学质量，阻碍计划的发展。这也可能对一些志愿者的参与产生影响。合成与应用。为了应对公民科学生物多样性记录和监测计划的公共数据存档的挑战，那些促进开放数据原则的人应该更好地认识到计划组织的存档功能。公共部门或商业或学术数据使用者增加财政支助可抵消财政风险。那些赞成公共数据存档的人应该做更多的工作，以促进非计划用户和发起计划之间的沟通，同时可能需要采取更灵活的数据存档方法，以解决对志愿人员参与的潜在影响。
Public data archiving (PDA) is widely advocated as a means of achieving open data standards, leading to improved data preservation, increased scientific reproducibility, and transparency, as well as additional data use. Public data archiving was primarily conceived to archive data from short‐term, single‐purpose scientific studies. It is now more widely applied, including to large‐scale citizen science biodiversity recording and monitoring schemes which combine the efforts of volunteers with professional scientists. This may affect the financial security of such schemes by reducing income from data and analytical services. Communication between scheme organizers and researchers may be disrupted, reducing scientific quality and impeding scheme development. It may also have an impact on the participation of some volunteers. Synthesis and applications. In response to the challenges of public data archiving for citizen science biodiversity recording and monitoring schemes, the archive function of scheme organizations should be better recognized by those promoting open data principles. Increased financial support from the public sector or from commercial or academic data users may offset financial risk. Those in favour of public data archiving should do more to facilitate communication between nonscheme users and the originating schemes, while a more flexible approach to data archiving may be required to address potential impacts on volunteer participation.