The role of co-opetition in low carbon manufacturing
The role of co-opetition in low carbon manufacturing
复制标题
合作竞争在低碳制造中的作用
DOI：
10.1016/j.ejor.2016.02.030
复制
发表时间：
2016-09-01
影响因子：
6.4
通讯作者：
Wang, Xiaojun
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Luo, Zheng;Chen, Xu;Wang, Xiaojun
低碳制造已成为许多发达和发展中经济体的战略目标。本研究探讨了合作竞争在实现这一目标中的作用。我们研究了限额与交易政策下减排效率不同的两家竞争对手的定价和减排政策。我们假设产品需求对价格和排放敏感。基于非合作博弈和合作博弈，分别在纯竞争和竞合市场环境下推导出两家厂商的最优解。通过讨论和数值分析，我们发现，无论是纯竞争模型还是竞合模型，两家制造商的最优价格都取决于碳排放交易的单价。此外，在纯竞争和竞合模型中，较高的减排效率会导致较低的最优单位碳排放量和较高的利润。有趣的是，与纯粹竞争相比，合作竞争会带来更多的利润和更少的碳排放总量。然而，经济和环境绩效的改善是基于更高的产品价格和单位碳排放量。 (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. 保留所有权利。
Low carbon manufacturing has become a strategic objective for many developed and developing economies. This study examines the role of co-opetition in achieving this objective. We investigate the pricing and emissions reduction policies for two rival manufacturers with different emission reduction efficiencies under the cap-and-trade policy. We assume that the product demand is price and emission sensitive. Based on non-cooperative and cooperative games, the optimal solutions for the two manufacturers are derived in the purely competitive and co-opetitive market environments respectively. Through the discussion and numerical analysis, we uncovered that in both pure competition and co-opetition models, the two manufacturers' optimal prices depend on the unit price of carbon emission trading. In addition, higher emission reduction efficiency leads to lower optimal unit carbon emissions and higher profit in both the pure competition and co-petition models. Interestingly, compared to pure competition, co-opetition will lead to more profit and less total carbon emissions. However, the improvement in economic and environmental performance is based on higher product prices and unit carbon emissions. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.