Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced and ferumoxytol-enhanced conventional and UTE-MRA for the depiction of the pulmonary vasculature

Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced and ferumoxytol-enhanced conventional and UTE-MRA for the depiction of the pulmonary vasculature
复制标题

DOI:
10.1002/mrm.27853
复制
发表时间:
2019-11-01
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Nagle, Scott K.
Nagle, Scott K.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Knobloch, Gesine;Colgan, Timothy;Nagle, Scott K.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:方法:20例健康志愿者在3 T条件下进行2次增强肺MRA检查,间隔至少4周。访视1:在注射0.1 mmol/kg钆贝葡胺(GD)之前和之后,MRA开始于常规的多相3DT 1加权屏气扰相梯度回波MRA。随后,自由呼吸GD-UTE-MRA被采集为一系列3个翻转角(FA)(6度,12度,18度),以优化T-1加权。访视2:注射4 mg/kg FE后,在稳定状态下进行MRA,从传统的3D T-1加权屏气扰相梯度回波MRA开始,然后是自由呼吸FE-UTE-MRA,均在4个不同的FA(6度,12度,18度,24度)。评价了最佳T-1对比度的最佳FA。采用多相GD常规肺MRA(cMRA)作为参考标准,在4点顺序量表上比较了两种方法在最佳FA时的图像质量。结果:FE cMRA和两种UTE-MRA技术在18度-24度范围内的翻转角可获得最佳T1对比度(p > 0.05)。在优化FA时,FE-UTE-MRA和GD cMRA的血管图像质量良好/极佳(98% vs 97%; p = 0.51)。与GD增强或FE增强的cMRA相比,两种UTE技术对非血管结构的显示均具有上级优势(p < .001)。然而,GD-UTE-MRA显示了最低的图像质量的血管造影,由于低图像对比度。结论:自由呼吸UTE-MRA使用FE是可行的,同时评估肺血管和非血管结构。患者研究应调查自由呼吸UTE-MRA评估肺栓塞的临床效用。
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of ferumoxytol (FE)-enhanced UTE-MRA for depiction of the pulmonary vascular and nonvascular structures.Methods: Twenty healthy volunteers underwent contrast-enhanced pulmonary MRA at 3 T during 2 visits, separated by at least 4 weeks. Visit 1: The MRA started with a conventional multiphase 3D T1-weighted breath-held spoiled gradient-echo MRA before and after the injection of 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (GD). Subsequently, free-breathing GD-UTE-MRA was acquired as a series of 3 flip angles (FAs) (6 degrees, 12 degrees, 18 degrees) to optimize T-1 weighting. Visit 2: After the injection of 4 mg/kg FE, MRA was performed during the steady state, starting with a conventional 3D T-1-weighted breath-held spoiled gradient-echo MRA and followed by freebreathing FE-UTE-MRA, both at 4 different FAs (6 degrees, 12 degrees, 18 degrees, 24 degrees). The optimal FA for best T-1 contrast was evaluated. Image quality at the optimal FA was compared between methods on a 4-point ordinal scale, using multiphase GD conventional pulmonary MRA (cMRA) as standard of reference.Results: Flip angle in the range of 18 degrees-24 degrees resulted in best T1 contrast for FE cMRA and both UTE-MRA techniques (p > .05). At optimized FA, image quality of the vasculature was good/excellent with both FE-UTE-MRA and GD cMRA (98% versus 97%; p = .51). Both UTE techniques provided superior depiction of nonvascular structures compared with either GD-enhanced or FE-enhanced cMRA (p < .001). However, GD-UTE-MRA showed the lowest image quality of the angiogram due to low image contrast.Conclusion: Free-breathing UTE-MRA using FE is feasible for simultaneous assessment of the pulmonary vasculature and nonvascular structures. Patient studies should investigate the clinical utility of free-breathing UTE-MRA for assessment of pulmonary emboli.