Rebreathing to cope with hyperventilation: Experimental tests of the paper bag method
Rebreathing to cope with hyperventilation: Experimental tests of the paper bag method
复制标题
再呼吸应对过度换气：纸袋法的实验测试
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1988
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
E. Griez
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Hout;C. Boek;G. V. D. Molen;A. Jansen;E. Griez
为了探索常见的再呼吸（纸袋）方法是否以及如何对过度通气起作用，进行了两个实验。在第一个实验中，12名正常志愿者，意识到常见的生理再呼吸的理由，两次被要求过度呼吸，然后要么再呼吸或重新开始正常通气。在重复呼吸条件下，肺泡CO2增加更快，身体症状消失更早。第二个实验有类似的设计;然而，这一次，受试者被引导相信，在两次过度换气激发试验后，他们在半封闭的管道系统中进行再呼吸。有一次，地铁系统实际上是开放的。在两种条件下，CO2恢复再次不同。在第二个实验中，症状消失的时刻在再呼吸条件下并没有明显提前。研究的综合结果表明，期望和建议在再呼吸方法对过度通气的影响中发挥作用。
To explore if and how the common rebreathing (paper bag) approach to hyperventilation works, two experiments were carried out. In the first experiment, 12 normal volunteers, aware of the common physiological rebreathing rationale, were twice asked to overbreath intensely and then either to rebreath or to restart normal ventilation. Alveolar CO2 increased more quickly and physical symptoms disappeared earlier in the rebreathing condition. The second experiment had a similar design; however, this time the subjects were led to believe that, after both hyperventilation provocation tests, they were rebreathing in a semiclosed tube system. On one of the occasions, the tube system was, in fact, open. The CO2 restoration again differed in the two conditions. In this second experiment, the moment of symptom disappearance was not significantly earlier in the rebreathing condition. The combined results of the studies suggest that expectation and suggestion play a role in the effects of rebreathing approaches on hyperventilation.
影响因子：
--
作者：
Woods,SW;Charney,DS;Loke,J;Goodman,WK;RedmondJr,DE;Heninger,GR
通讯作者：
Heninger,GR
一组惊恐障碍患者对过度换气的反应。
DOI：
10.1176/ajp.141.7.857
发表时间：
1984
期刊：
The American journal of psychiatry
影响因子：
--
作者：
Gorman,JM;Askanazi,J;Liebowitz,MR;Fyer,AJ;Stein,J;Kinney,JM;Klein,DF
通讯作者：
Klein,DF