Process Intensification
Process Intensification
复制标题
DOI:
10.1201/9780203913291.ch1
复制
发表时间:
2019-10
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Citterio
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Citterio
Over the years, the meaning of the term “process intensification” has changed and today, there is still no precise and generally accepted definition. At least there is a general consensus about the fact that process intensification requires a holistic view on the process, considering the process as a whole system. But the term itself is essentially used as a collective term for diverse measures that aim at a “significant” improvement of a process with regard to its efficiency. The problem with that definition is how one can distinguish process intensification from classical process optimization and to what extent an improvement qualifies as “significant” (or “drastic”). In addition, the measure for the efficiency of a process can still be quite diverse (e.g., energy efficiency vs. time efficiency) which makes things even more difficult. Often, process intensification is associated with striking but vague catch phrases like “cheaper, smaller, cleaner” or “making more with less”. This may be appropriate regarding current discussions in the context of sustainable development. For example, the possibly enhanced corporate image might be one reason for companies to implement process intensification solutions. However, all these purely descriptive and qualitative attributes do not contribute to specify the term “process intensification” more precisely. In the academic community, the lack of an appropriate and exact definition has led to controversial discussions about whether it is necessary at all to propagate process intensification as a new discipline. Hence, there is a clear need of a distinct definition. In a recent contribution [1] a new approach to process intensification has been proposed, based on a concept which encourages a more fundamental view on the individual process steps by analyzing process routes in the thermodynamic state space. This allows for the identification of optimal process routes and provides a basis for a systematic and rigorous classification of process intensification options. In the following, possibilities for process intensification measures will be outlined for which improvements in productivity have been reported in the literature. These improvements can concern, e.g., a reduction of the plant size by reducing the size of single apparatuses or by reducing the number of the latter by integrating two or more unit operations into a multifunctional unit. Other intensification potentials concern, e.g., the specific energy consumption, the amount of reactants used and of waste products being produced for a specified production height (i.e., the feedstock efficiency). In many cases, the measures to perform the process improvements have been found incidentally or as an empirical result of a series of experimental studies. To summarize, there is currently neither a theoretical basis nor are there scientific guidelines for process intensification available that can be generalized and thus help to identify process intensification options when analyzing a chemical process as to its efficiency. The categorization given in Figure 1 illustrates the constituents of process intensification. Process intensification can be achieved by an enhancement of processes which leads to smaller apparatuses and/or by process integration which leads to a reduced number of