Discriminating between cognitive and supportive group therapies for chronic mental illness.

Discriminating between cognitive and supportive group therapies for chronic mental illness.
复制标题

区分慢性精神疾病的认知疗法和支持性团体疗法。

DOI:
10.1097/01.nmd.0000230635.03400.2d
复制
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
The Journal of nervous and mental disease.
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Sullivan,Mary
Sullivan,Mary
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hayes,SarahA;Hope,DebraA;Terryberry-Spohr,LoriS;Spaulding,WilliamD;Vandyke,Melanie;Elting,DirkT;Poland,Jeffrey;Mohamed,Somaia;Garbin,CalvinP;Reed,Dorie;Sullivan,Mary

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本研究采用描述性比较研究的方法,以Q排序法描述住院慢性精神疾病患者两种团体治疗的共同因素。虽然药物治疗慢性精神疾病是突出的,有越来越多的证据表明,认知疗法也是有效的。检查的小组是一项更大研究的一部分,该研究比较了认知与支持性小组治疗对治疗环境的额外益处。一般来说,项目描述治疗师的态度和行为,参与者的态度和行为,或小组互动。结果提出的项目是最多和最少的每种治疗和项目,区分两种模式。两组治疗师均表现出良好的治疗技巧。然而,认知组被描述为比支持组更有动力和积极性,这表明两组在治疗的共同和特定因素方面存在差异。
This descriptive and comparative study employed a Q-sort process to describe common factors of therapy in two group therapies for inpatients with chronic mental illness. While pharmacological treatments for chronic mental illness are prominent, there is growing evidence that cognitive therapy is also efficacious. Groups examined were part of a larger study comparing the added benefits of cognitive versus supportive group therapy to the treatment milieu. In general, items described the therapist's attitudes and behaviors, the participants' attitudes and behaviors, or the group interactions. Results present items that were most and least characteristic of each therapy and items that discriminate between the two modalities. Therapists in both groups demonstrated good therapy skills. However, the cognitive group was described as being more motivated and active than the supportive group, indicating that the groups differed in terms of common as well as specific factors of treatment.