TESTING AND TRAINING OF THE EGGBEATER KICK MOVEMENT IN WATER POLO: APPLICABILITY OF A NEW METHOD
TESTING AND TRAINING OF THE EGGBEATER KICK MOVEMENT IN WATER POLO: APPLICABILITY OF A NEW METHOD
复制标题
DOI：
10.1519/jsc.0000000000000946
复制
发表时间：
2015-10-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Bonifazi, Marco
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Melchiorri, Giovanni;Viero, Valerio;Bonifazi, Marco
Melchiorri，G，Viero，V，Triossi，T，Tancredi，V，Galvani，C，and Bonifazi，M.水球打蛋器踢腿动作的测试与训练：一种新方法的适用性。J Strength Cond Res 29（10）：2758-2764，2015在波罗中，许多技术动作和与对手的接触都是在准垂直漂浮位置进行的，使用两种类型的下肢动作：打蛋器踢最常用于战斗和传球，蛙泳踢用于跳跃和投掷。本研究的目的是确定一个新的系统来评估和训练打蛋踢运动，并验证其适用性。20名业余选手和22名精英选手参加了这项研究。使用了一件自制的、易于制作的夹克，允许在水中施加过载，但不妨碍呼吸或移动。收集了标准人体测量和由不同的打蛋器踢动作试验组成的测试，直到随着过载的增加（5、7.5、10、12.5、15和17.5 kg）而耗尽。测定每种负荷的至耗竭时间和第2秒的过载估计最大值（OEMV）。优秀运动员与非优秀运动员的体重、身高、下肢肌肉运动能力有显著性差异（p0.05）。采用受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线分析评价两个亚组中不同测量变量的有效性和OEMV的有效性。不同过载的ROC曲线下面积分别为：5 kg为0.72（0.53-0.92），7.5 kg为0.80（0.68-0.90），10 kg为0.87（0.77-0.91），12.5 kg为0.88（0.84-0.92）。我们的研究结果表明，该测试是足够敏感的，因此可以用来计划和控制训练和受伤恢复。
Melchiorri, G, Viero, V, Triossi, T, Tancredi, V, Galvani, C, and Bonifazi, M. Testing and training of the eggbeater kick movement in water polo: Applicability of a new method. J Strength Cond Res 29(10): 2758-2764, 2015In water polo, many of the technical actions and the contacts with the opponent take place in quasi-vertical floating position using 2 types of lower limb actions: the eggbeater kick is used most often in fighting and passing and the breaststroke kick in jumping and throwing. The aim of this study was to identify a new system to evaluate and to train the eggbeater kick movement and to verify its applicability. Twenty amateur players and 22 elite players participated in the study. A jacket, homemade and easy to make, allowing the application of an overload submerged in water but not hindering breathing or mobility, was used. Standard anthropometry and a test consisting of different trials of the eggbeater kick action until exhaustion with an increasing overload (5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, and 17.5 kg) were collected. Time to exhaustion and the overload estimated maximum value (OEMV) at second 2 were determined for each load. Body weight, height, and lower limb muscle performance of the elite and nonelite players were significantly different from each other (p 0.05). The effectiveness of the different measured variables in both subgroups and that of the OEMV was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Areas under the ROC curve for the different overloads were 0.72 (0.53-0.92) for 5 kg, 0.80 (0.68-0.90) for 7.5 kg, 0.87 (0.77-0.91) for 10 kg, and 0.88 (0.84-0.92) for 12.5 kg overload. Our results show that the test is sensitive enough and therefore can be used to plan and control training and injury recovery.