The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research.
The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research.
复制标题
多次插补的兴起:对医学研究方法的报告和实施的综述。
DOI:
10.1186/s12874-015-0022-1
复制
发表时间:
2015-04-07
影响因子:
4
通讯作者:
Simpson JA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hayati Rezvan P;Lee KJ;Simpson JA
Missing data are common in medical research, which can lead to a loss in statistical power and potentially biased results if not handled appropriately. Multiple imputation (MI) is a statistical method, widely adopted in practice, for dealing with missing data. Many academic journals now emphasise the importance of reporting information regarding missing data and proposed guidelines for documenting the application of MI have been published. This review evaluated the reporting of missing data, the application of MI including the details provided regarding the imputation model, and the frequency of sensitivity analyses within the MI framework in medical research articles. A systematic review of articles published in the Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine between January 2008 and December 2013 in which MI was implemented was carried out. We identified 103 papers that used MI, with the number of papers increasing from 11 in 2008 to 26 in 2013. Nearly half of the papers specified the proportion of complete cases or the proportion with missing data by each variable. In the majority of the articles (86%) the imputed variables were specified. Of the 38 papers (37%) that stated the method of imputation, 20 used chained equations, 8 used multivariate normal imputation, and 10 used alternative methods. Very few articles (9%) detailed how they handled non-normally distributed variables during imputation. Thirty-nine papers (38%) stated the variables included in the imputation model. Less than half of the papers (46%) reported the number of imputations, and only two papers compared the distribution of imputed and observed data. Sixty-six papers presented the results from MI as a secondary analysis. Only three articles carried out a sensitivity analysis following MI to assess departures from the missing at random assumption, with details of the sensitivity analyses only provided by one article. This review outlined deficiencies in the documenting of missing data and the details provided about imputation. Furthermore, only a few articles performed sensitivity analyses following MI even though this is strongly recommended in guidelines. Authors are encouraged to follow the available guidelines and provide information on missing data and the imputation process. The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0022-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa0912321
发表时间:
2010-07-01
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Brott TG;Hobson RW 2nd;Howard G;Roubin GS;Clark WM;Brooks W;Mackey A;Hill MD;Leimgruber PP;Sheffet AJ;Howard VJ;Moore WS;Voeks JH;Hopkins LN;Cutlip DE;Cohen DJ;Popma JJ;Ferguson RD;Cohen SN;Blackshear JL;Silver FL;Mohr JP;Lal BK;Meschia JF;CREST Investigators
通讯作者:
CREST Investigators
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa1001288
发表时间:
2010-07-15
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
ACCORD Study Group;ACCORD Eye Study Group;Chew EY;Ambrosius WT;Davis MD;Danis RP;Gangaputra S;Greven CM;Hubbard L;Esser BA;Lovato JF;Perdue LH;Goff DC Jr;Cushman WC;Ginsberg HN;Elam MB;Genuth S;Gerstein HC;Schubart U;Fine LJ
通讯作者:
Fine LJ
影响因子:
168.9
作者:
Caroli, Anna;Perico, Norberto;Ruggenenti, Piero
通讯作者:
Ruggenenti, Piero
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Armstrong, Paul W.;Gershlick, Anthony H.;Van de Werf, Frans
通讯作者:
Van de Werf, Frans
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Feldman, Ted;Foster, Elyse;Mauri, Laura
通讯作者:
Mauri, Laura