A modified version of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II for cognitive matching of infants with and without Down syndrome.
A modified version of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II for cognitive matching of infants with and without Down syndrome.
复制标题
婴儿发育贝利量表 II 的修改版本，用于患有和不患有唐氏综合症的婴儿的认知匹配。
DOI：
10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01064.x
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Oates,JM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Moore,DG;Goodwin,JE;Oates,JM
许多婴儿早期认知发展的测量，包括BSID-II（婴儿发展的贝利量表），混合在一起的测试项目，评估许多不同的发展领域，包括语言，注意力，运动功能和社会能力，有些项目有助于评估一个以上的领域。因此，规模可能会导致在一些临床样本的认知能力估计不足或过高，可能不是最好的措施，用于matching purposes.MethodTo解决这个问题，我们创建了一个修改后的形式的BSID-II（BSID-M），以提供一个“纯粹的”评估一般的认知能力在婴儿唐氏综合征（DS）从6至18个月的年龄。我们从原始测量中排除了一些涉及语言，运动，注意力和社会功能的项目。将这种改良形式给予17名6、12和18个月大的唐氏综合征婴儿和41名4岁时发育正常的婴儿，结果表明，修改后的形式继续提供了一个有意义的和稳定的测量认知功能，并揭示了DS婴儿可能得分略高，在一般认知能力方面，当使用这种修改的形式与使用标准BSID-II量表时相比。结论对于需要“更纯粹”的测量方法来匹配DS婴儿和其他智障婴儿认知功能的研究人员来说，这种修改后的形式可能很有用。
BackgroundMany measures of infants' early cognitive development, including the BSID‐II (The Bayley Scales of Infant Development), mix together test items that assess a number of different developmental domains including language, attention, motor functioning and social abilities, and some items contribute to the assessment of more than one domain. Consequently, the scales may lead to under‐ or over‐estimates of cognitive abilities in some clinical samples and may not be the best measure to use for matching purposes.MethodTo address this issue we created a modified form of the BSID‐II (the BSID‐M) to provide a ‘purer’ assessment of the general cognitive capacities in infants with Down syndrome (DS) from 6 to 18 months of age. We excluded a number of items that implicated language, motor, attentional and social functioning from the original measure. This modified form was administered to 17 infants with Down syndrome when 6, 12 and 18 months old and to 41 typically developing infants at 4, 7 and 10 months old.ResultsThe results suggested that the modified form continued to provide a meaningful and stable measure of cognitive functioning and revealed that DS infants may score marginally higher in terms of general cognitive abilities when using this modified form than they might when using the standard BSID‐II scales.ConclusionsThis modified form may be useful for researchers who need a ‘purer’ measure with which to match infants with DS and other infants with intellectual disabilities on cognitive functioning.