Systematic Review and Classification of the Engineering for Global Development Literature Based on Design Tools and Methods for Social Impact Consideration

Systematic Review and Classification of the Engineering for Global Development Literature Based on Design Tools and Methods for Social Impact Consideration
复制标题

DOI:
10.1115/1.4055325
复制
发表时间:
2023-03-01
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Salmon,John L. L.
Salmon,John L. L.
中科院分区:
工程技术3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Armstrong,Andrew G. G.;Suk,Hailie;Salmon,John L. L.

文献摘要

相似文献

虽然社会科学和全球发展领域存在并使用许多评估社会影响的工具和方法,但工程界缺乏考虑产品更广泛社会影响的标准方法。这些方法在工程界没有广泛使用的一些原因包括设计者不了解这些方法,或者方法没有广泛适用。本研究的目的是帮助设计师和研究人员找到实现社会影响考虑的相关设计工具和方法。这是通过对全球发展工程 (EGD) 文献中的 374 篇论文进行分类来完成的,这些论文按照方法目的、行业部门、考虑的社会影响、可持续发展目标、论文设置和所需的数据输入等多个维度进行分类。本文介绍了设计师和研究人员如何使用这套分类论文来找到相关的设计工具和方法,以改善其工作中的社会影响考虑。
While many tools and methodologies for assessing social impact exist and are used in the social science and global development fields, there is a lack of standard methods for considering the broader social impact of products in the engineering community. Some reasons these methods are not as widely used in the engineering community include designers not being aware of the methods, or methods not being widely applicable. The purpose of this research is to help designers and researchers find relevant design tools and methods for implementing social impact considerations. This is done through the classification of 374 papers in the Engineering for Global Development (EGD) literature along several dimensions including method purpose, industry sector, social impacts considered, sustainable development goals, paper setting, and data inputs required. This article describes how designers and researchers can use this set of classified papers to locate relevant design tools and methods to improve social impact considerations in their work.