Contrasting pharmacological ETB receptor blockade with genetic ETB deficiency in renal responses to big ET-1.

Contrasting pharmacological ETB receptor blockade with genetic ETB deficiency in renal responses to big ET-1.
复制标题

对比药理学 ETB 受体阻断与遗传性 ETB 缺陷对大 ET-1 的肾脏反应。

DOI:
10.1152/physiolgenomics.2001.6.1.39
复制
发表时间:
2001
期刊:
Physiological genomics.
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Pollock,DM
Pollock,DM
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pollock,DM

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

进行肾清除研究以确定ETB受体在肾对大内皮素-1(big ET-1)的反应中的作用。在Inactin麻醉的大鼠上进行了两个系列的实验,以对比ETB受体的急性药理学阻断与遗传性ETB受体缺乏。在第一个系列中,给予Sprague-Dawley大鼠ETB选择性拮抗剂A-192621或溶媒(0.9% NaCl),然后输注大ET-1(10 pmol·kg−1·min−1)给药60 min。A-192621显著升高基线平均动脉压(MAP:102 ± 4 vs. 141 ± 6 mmHg,P< 0.05)和尿流率(0.5 ± 0.1 vs. 1.3 ± 0.2 μl/min,P< 0.05)对肾小球滤过率(GFR)和有效肾血浆流量(ERPF)无任何影响。大ET-1使两组大鼠MAP均明显升高,但拮抗剂组升高幅度更大(120 ± 6vs.169 ± 6 mmHg,P< 0.05)。大ET-1使对照组大鼠尿量增加,而拮抗剂组大鼠尿量减少。给予大剂量ET-1的大鼠GFR和ERPF降低,而阻断ET-1则加重了这种作用。另一系列实验检测了缺乏功能性肾ETB受体的大鼠(称为斑点致死(sl)大鼠)对大ET-1的反应。令人惊讶的是,ETB受体缺陷的杂合子(sl/+)大鼠与纯合子(sl/sl)大鼠相比具有显著更高的基线MAP(134 ± 6vs.112 ± 7 mmHg,P< 0.05),尽管其他变量相似。大ET-1对两组MAP无明显影响。两组的尿流量、GFR和ERPF均显著降低,尽管这些变化在大鼠中要大得多。这些实验表明,ET-1受体在限制大ET-1引起的肾血流动力学反应中起重要作用。此外,大ET-1的利尿作用需要功能性ET B受体。
Renal clearance studies were conducted to determine the role of ETBreceptors in the renal response to big endothelin-1 (big ET-1). Two series of experiments were conducted on Inactin-anesthetized rats to contrast acute pharmacological blockade of ETBreceptors vs. genetic ETBreceptor deficiency. In the first series, Sprague-Dawley rats were given either ETB-selective antagonist, A-192621, or vehicle (0.9% NaCl) prior to infusion of big ET-1 (10 pmol·kg−1·min−1) for 60 min. A-192621 significantly increased baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP; 102 ± 4 vs. 141 ± 6 mmHg,P< 0.05) and urine flow rate (0.5 ± 0.1 vs. 1.3 ± 0.2 μl/min,P< 0.05) without any effect on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) or effective renal plasma flow (ERPF). Big ET-1 significantly increased MAP in both groups but to a higher level in rats given antagonist (120 ± 6 vs. 169 ± 6 mmHg,P< 0.05). Big ET-1 increased urine flow in control rats but decreased in rats given antagonist. GFR and ERPF were decreased in rats given big ET-1, an effect that was exaggerated by ETBblockade. Another series of experiments examined the response to big ET-1 in rats lacking functional renal ETBreceptors, known as spotting lethal (sl) rats. Surprisingly, rats heterozygous (sl/+) for ETBreceptor deficiency had a significantly higher baseline MAP compared with homozygous (sl/sl) rats (134 ± 6 vs. 112 ± 7 mmHg,P< 0.05), although other variables were similar. Big ET-1 produced no significant change in MAP in either group. Urine flow, GFR, and ERPF were significantly decreased in both groups, although these changes were much larger insl/slrats. These experiments indicate that the ETBreceptor plays an important role in limiting the renal hemodynamic response to big ET-1. Furthermore, the diuretic actions of big ET-1 require a functional ETBreceptor.