Beyond radicalism and resignation: the competing logics for public participation in policy decisions
Beyond radicalism and resignation: the competing logics for public participation in policy decisions
复制标题
DOI：
10.1332/030557316x14531466517034
复制
发表时间：
2017-04-01
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
Dean, Rikki John
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dean, Rikki John
参与-如同正义或自由-是一个可以用多种方式构建的术语。然而，现有的参与类型学很少关注公众参与决策的替代逻辑：要么他们假设一个特定的规范性偏见或分类的制度设计特征，而不参考更广泛的意识形态，通知使用这些设计。本文概述了另一种方法，连接的各种参与性的做法，民主和公共行政的竞争理论。它确定了参与的四个原型：知识转让;集体决策;选择和发言权;仲裁和监督。
Participation - like justice or freedom - is a term that can be constructed in multiple ways. However, existing typologies of participation pay little attention to the alternative logics for public participation in policy decisions: either they assume one particular normative bias or categorise by institutional design features without reference to the broader ideology that informs the use of these designs. This paper outlines an alternative approach that connects the variety in participatory practices to competing theories of democracy and public administration. It identifies four archetypes of participation: knowledge transfer; collective decision-making; choice and voice; and arbitration and oversight.