Revisiting Individual Creativity Assessment: Triangulation in Subjective and Objective Assessment Methods
Revisiting Individual Creativity Assessment: Triangulation in Subjective and Objective Assessment Methods
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/10400419.2016.1125259
复制
发表时间：
2016-01-02
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Lee, Jinju
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Park, Namgyoo K.;Chun, Monica Youngshin;Lee, Jinju
相对于创造力研究的显著发展，个体创造力研究尚未就评估个体创造力的最有效和最可靠的方法达成有意义的共识。这项研究重新审视了两种最流行的评估个人创造力的方法：主观和客观方法。本研究以1,500名被试为研究对象，探讨不同的创造力评估方法是否会影响创造力的测量结果。研究结果显示，主观评估与客观评估方法有较小的变异，较高的平均值和中度但显着的相关性。这种差异的动机可能是社会期望、一致性动机、虚幻的优越感和宽容偏见。基于这些发现，本研究强调需要承认主观和客观的评估方法可能会影响个人的创造力评估结果。
Compared to the significant development of creativity studies, individual creativity research has not reached a meaningful consensus regarding the most valid and reliable method for assessing individual creativity. This study revisited 2 of the most popular methods for assessing individual creativity: subjective and objective methods. This study analyzed 1,500 individuals to investigate whether the methods for assessing individual creativity affect the measurement outcomes of individual creativity. Findings indicated that subjective assessments have a smaller variance a higher mean and a moderate but significant correlation with objective assessment methods. Such differences can be motivated by social desirability, consistency motif, illusory superiority, and leniency biases. Based on these findings, this study highlighted the need to acknowledge how subjective and objective assessment methods may affect individual creativity assessment outcomes.