Joint factor analysis of the Personality Research Form and the Jackson Personality Inventory: Comparisons with the Big Five

Joint factor analysis of the Personality Research Form and the Jackson Personality Inventory: Comparisons with the Big Five
复制标题

DOI:
10.1006/jrpe.1998.2214
复制
发表时间:
1998-06-01
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Paunonen, SV
Paunonen, SV
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ashton, MC;Jackson, DN;Paunonen, SV

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

人格研究表(PRF)和杰克逊人格量表(JPI)的共同因素分析的样本中的528名受访者的五个因素的解决方案,以比较大五人格因素的目的。与Saucier的形容词小标记的大五比较发现,三个PRF-JPI方差最大因素有很强的和几乎同构的关系,大五外向性,尽责性,和智力/想象力的因素,分别其他两个PRF-JPI因素强烈相关的可接受性和情绪稳定性,但出现这些因素的变体,旋转约45度,从他们的传统位置。几个PRF和JPI量表--包括PRF危害避免、JPI价值正统性、JPI能量水平、JPI风险承担和JPI社交熟练度--与五大因素中的任何一个或两个都没有密切关系。(C)北京:科学出版社.
Personality Research Form (PRF) and Jackson Personality Inventory (JPI) scales were jointly factor analyzed on a sample of 528 respondents with the aim of comparing a five-factor solution to the Big Five personality factors. Comparisons with Saucier's Adjective Mini-Markers of the Big Five revealed that three of the PRF-JPI varimax factors had strong and nearly isomorphic relations to the Big Five Extraversion, Conscientiousness, and Intellect/Imagination factors, respectively The other two PRF-JPI factors were strongly related to Agreeableness and Emotional Stability but emerged as variants of these factors, rotated about 45 degrees from their traditional locations. Several PRF and JPI scales-including PRF Harm-avoidance, JPI Value Orthodoxy, JPI Energy Level, JPI Risk Taking, and JPI Social Adroitness-were not strongly related to any one or two of the Big Five factors. (C) 1998 Academic Press.