When praise is worth considering in a difficult conversation.
When praise is worth considering in a difficult conversation.
复制标题
当在困难的谈话中值得考虑表扬时。
DOI:
10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61401-8
复制
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Tulsky,JamesA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Back,AnthonyL;Arnold,RobertM;Baile,WalterF;Edwards,KellyA;Tulsky,JamesA
In one of our recent communication skills workshops, we were helping a physician trainee talk to the wife of a patient with relapsed lymphoma. In this teaching scenario, the patient has become septic and is offstage in the intensive care unit; the physician is talking to the patient’s wife, who he knows quite well. The wife has a seemingly bottomless well of questions. The physician, who had wanted to be empathic, was instead struggling to be civil (“I wanted to say”, he explained later,“you’re missing the big picture”). Although the physician tried answering all the wife’s questions, she appeared more and more dissatisfied. The facilitator stopped the scenario to allow for discussion and brainstorming; the physician and the rest of the group were stuck.“I’ve seen people like this before. They’re impossible!” So the facilitator made a suggestion.“It’s fine to acknowledge to yourself that you are irritated. But when you respond, what if you address what’s good about the wife’s actions? What if you say,“You have done an amazing job advocating for your husband. I realise that you are trying to make sure that every detail of his care is handled correctly.” The trainee looked sceptical.“Really?” Physicians tend to overlook praise as part of the communication repertoire. Although we acknowledge that praise has received little attention empirically, we think praise deserves special mention because we find that, if used judiciously, praise is a powerful tool that can help deepen conversation and enable physician and patient to move through difficult conversations. The facilitator restarted the conversation, and the physician praised the wife’s effort.“Of course”, said the wife,“this is my husband whose life is on the line”.“Well”, the physician responded,“I have taken care of a lot of very ill people and not every family makes this kind of effort. I’m impressed with all that you have done.”“Hmmm”, said the wife, who thought for a minute before speaking again.“Thank you for saying that. Sometimes I worry that the nurses just think I’m nosy. But every time I leave I’m so worried about what could happen. He’s hanging on by a thread.” Later in the debriefing, the physician named this moment as the turning point in the conversation. The wife, when asked by the facilitator what she was thinking about at that moment, said “I felt the doctor recognised something of what I was going through, that he could see that I was trying to be the best wife possible.” The physician’s praise enabled the wife to articulate the concerns running underneath her questions. As with other communication skills, praise seems to be intuitive when performed fluently by an expert. Yet communication skills are largely learned, and constitute a distinctive expertise repertoire within doctoring. One speculation about why physicians tend to neglect praise is that they associate praise with feedback on their performance. A common educational practice in the USA is the “feedback sandwich”, in which a piece of negative feedback is “sandwiched” between two pieces of positive feedback, presumably to make the negative feedback more palatable. The upshot is that many American medical trainees have been conditioned to regard positive feedback as an introductory statement for negative feedback. These trainees have learned to brace themselves after the “but” for the real point. Thus, we want to distinguish positive feedback given by educators on a trainee’s behaviour from praise given by a clinician to a patient or family member about their intentions or efforts. We use praise to show a kind of respect for the person, offering our esteem for the way they cope with a scary, complicated, and often lonely situation. In considering the use of …