Evaluation of the performances of different atomic charge and nonelectrostatic models in the finite‐difference Poisson–Boltzmann approach
Evaluation of the performances of different atomic charge and nonelectrostatic models in the finite‐difference
Poisson–Boltzmann
approach
复制标题
有限差分泊松-玻尔兹曼方法中不同原子电荷和非静电模型的性能评估
DOI:
10.1002/qua.26560
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
2.2
通讯作者:
F. Labat
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dario Vassetti;F. Labat
In this work, we investigate the effects of different atomic charge and nonelectrostatic models on the hydration energies of neutral molecules, using an implicit solvation model. The solvation free energy is divided into two main components, the first resulting from a self‐consistent reaction field treatment of the bulk electrostatics obtained by solving the Poisson equation in a finite‐difference (FD) approach where the solute charge density is approximated by atomic charges, the second corresponding to short‐range interactions between the solute and the solvent in the first solvation shell. Five different atomic charge models (Mulliken, Hirshfeld, Hirshfeld‐I, CM5 and its iterative version, CM5‐I) have been considered, both at the Hartree–Fock (HF) and B3LYP levels, with three different basis sets, alongside two nonelectrostatic models including the cavity, dispersion, and solvent structural effects (CDS) model. Averaging over the three considered basis sets, Hirshfeld charges combined to the CDS model led to the lowest mean unsigned error (MUE), with a value of 0.92 kcal/mol with respect to the experimental data. On the other hand, a MUE of 2.02 kcal/mol was obtained with CM5 charges combined to the CDS model, highlighting the low transferability of the original CDS parameters developed for the generalized Born electrostatics to a different electrostatics model. By scaling down the CM5 charges to better balance with the original CDS model, a MUE of 0.68 kcal/mol was however obtained, outlining the delicate balance existing between the electrostatic and nonelectrostatic contributions to the solvation free energy in implicit solvation models.
DOI:
10.1021/acs.jpca.5b03159
发表时间:
2015-06-04
期刊:
The journal of physical chemistry. A
影响因子:
--
作者:
Mei Y;Simmonett AC;Pickard FC 4th;DiStasio RA Jr;Brooks BR;Shao Y
通讯作者:
Shao Y