Planning the Public: Some Comments on Empirical Problems for Planning Theory
Planning the Public: Some Comments on Empirical Problems for Planning Theory
复制标题
规划公众：对规划理论实证问题的一些评论
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Abram
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Abram
本文通过研究英国规划过程中的一些实证困难来讨论交流和参与式规划的概念。它侧重于当地规划过程参与者对规划和未来的目标和方法的不同理解。需要考虑两个特殊问题：参与者获得合法性所需的代表性概念，以及过程与结果之间的脱节。本文进一步将规划仪式视为一种制度化思想形式，支持特定类型的治理并重视某些认识论和技术。这也挑战了哈贝马斯的观点，即参与者可以在讨论过程中以某种方式搁置自己的利益或权力，因为这假设权力和利益是可以摆脱的属性，而不是从内在的思维方式和存在于世界中流淌出来。
This paper addresses the notions of communicative and participative planning through an examination of some empirical difficulties in the case of a British planning process. It focuses on the different understandings found amongst participants to a local plan process in terms of the aims and methods of planning and of the future. Two particular problems are considered: the notion of representativeness required for participants to achieve legitimacy, and the disconnections between process and outcome. The paper further considers the rituals of planning as a form of institutionalized thought that supports a particular sort of governance and lends weight to certain epistemologies and technologies. This also challenges the Habermasian notion that participants can somehow set aside their own interests or power during discussions, since this assumes that power and interests are attributes that can be shed, rather than flowing from intrinsic ways of thinking and being in the world.