Risk Management in Megaprojects

Risk Management in Megaprojects
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.046
复制
发表时间:
2014-03
期刊:
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Irimia-Dieguez;Alvaro Sanchez-Cazorla;Rafaela Alfalla-Luque
A. Irimia-Dieguez;Alvaro Sanchez-Cazorla;Rafaela Alfalla-Luque
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Irimia-Dieguez;Alvaro Sanchez-Cazorla;Rafaela Alfalla-Luque

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

尽管风险管理与大型项目的成功高度相关,但它仍然是最不发达的研究问题之一。风险管理是一个由多个阶段组成的过程。本文着重于这些阶段的第一个:风险识别。我们的目的是建立最先进的大型项目风险管理,系统化的文献中研究的风险,以及确定进一步研究的潜在领域。为此,进行了系统的审查。对2000年以来在主要数据库(WoK、Scopus和ABI)中发表的学术期刊和会议论文进行了审查。使用ATLAS.ti和检查表进行了定性分析。本文的主要贡献包括:对大型项目风险管理的文献进行了计量分析,对大型项目风险进行了系统的分类,对大型项目风险管理的研究成果进行了系统的评价,对大型项目风险管理的研究成果进行了系统的分析,并对大型项目风险管理的研究成果进行了总结。由拟议风险分类组成的两个矩阵,第一个与所研究的部门有关,第二个与不同的利益攸关方有关;并指出了大型项目风险管理研究中的不足之处。风险的系统化有助于管理者在风险管理中识别风险,大型项目,并遵循风险管理过程中的后续步骤。此外,制定的风险转移矩阵可使管理人员分析谁是支持每一风险的最佳伙伴。此外,从学术的角度来看,未来的研究线的潜在领域。
Despite its high relevance to the success of megaprojects, risk management remains one of the least developed research issues. Risk management is a process composed of several phases. This paper is focused on the first of these phases: risk identification. Our purpose is to establish the state of the art in risk management in megaprojects, systematize the risks studied in the literature, as well as to identify potential areas of further research. To this end, a systematic review is carried out. Academic journals and conference papers published from 2000 onwards in main databases (WoK, Scopus and ABI) have been examined. A qualitative analysis has been performed by using ATLAS.ti together with a checklist. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no previous systematic revision of papers on risk management in megaprojects has ever been carried out, although certain authors have emphasized its importance.The contribution of this research includes: a bibliometric analysis of the papers that focus on risk management in megaprojects; a systematization and classification of the risks; tw†o matrices comprised of the proposed risk categorization, first in relation to the sector studied, and second related with the different stakeholders; and an identification of gaps in the research in risk management in megaprojects.The systematization of the risks helps managers towards their identification within the megaproject, and to follow the subsequent steps in the risk management process. Moreover, the matrix developed on the transfer of risks can enable managers to analyse who would be the best partner to support each risk. Furthermore, from an academic point of view, potential areas for future lines of research are presented.