Varenicline versus transdermal nicotine patch for smoking cessation: results from a randomised open-label trial.

Varenicline versus transdermal nicotine patch for smoking cessation: results from a randomised open-label trial.
复制标题

用于戒烟的Varenicline与透皮尼古丁斑块:随机开放标签试验的结果。

DOI:
10.1136/thx.2007.090647
复制
发表时间:
2008-08
期刊:
影响因子:
10
通讯作者:
Reeves, K. R.
Reeves, K. R.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Aubin, H-J;Bobak, A.;Britton, J. R.;Oncken, C.;Billing, C. B., Jr.;Gong, J.;Williams, K. E.;Reeves, K. R.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

Varenicline, a new treatment for smoking cessation, has demonstrated significantly greater efficacy over placebo and sustained release bupropion (bupropion SR). A study was undertaken to compare a 12-week standard regimen of varenicline with a 10-week standard regimen of transdermal nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) for smoking cessation. In this 52-week, open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial conducted in Belgium, France, the Netherlands, UK and USA, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive varenicline uptitrated to 1 mg twice daily for 12 weeks or transdermal NRT (21 mg/day reducing to 7 mg/day) for 10 weeks. Non-treatment follow-up continued to week 52. The primary outcome was the biochemically confirmed (exhaled carbon monoxide ⩽10 ppm) self-reported continuous abstinence rate (CAR) for the last 4 weeks of the treatment period in participants who had taken at least one dose of treatment. Secondary outcomes included CAR from the last 4 weeks of treatment through weeks 24 and 52, and measures of craving, withdrawal and smoking satisfaction. A total of 376 and 370 participants assigned to varenicline and NRT, respectively, were eligible for analysis. The CAR for the last 4 weeks of treatment was significantly greater for varenicline (55.9%) than NRT (43.2%; OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.28, p<0.001). The week 52 CAR (NRT, weeks 8–52; varenicline, weeks 9–52) was 26.1% for varenicline and 20.3% for NRT (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.99, p = 0.056). Varenicline significantly reduced craving (p<0.001), withdrawal symptoms (p<0.001) and smoking satisfaction (p<0.001) compared with NRT. The most frequent adverse event was nausea (varenicline, 37.2%; NRT, 9.7%). The outcomes of this trial established that abstinence from smoking was greater and craving, withdrawal symptoms and smoking satisfaction were less at the end of treatment with varenicline than with transdermal NRT. NCT00143325.
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.011
发表时间: 2007-06-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Tsai, Shih-Tzu;Cho, Hong-Jun;Williams, Kathryn E.
通讯作者: Williams, Kathryn E.
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2004.008649
发表时间: 2005-06-01
期刊: TOBACCO CONTROL
影响因子: 5.2
作者:
West, R;DiMarino, ME;McNeill, A
通讯作者: McNeill, A
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006103.pub6
发表时间: 2012-01-01
影响因子: 1.4
作者:
Cahill, Kate;Stead, Lindsay F.;Polonio, Igor Bastos
通讯作者: Polonio, Igor Bastos
DOI: 10.1185/030079905x43712
发表时间: 2005-05-01
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
Joseph, CC;Bushmakin, AG;Gilbert, DG
通讯作者: Gilbert, DG
DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00497.x
发表时间: 2003-11-01
期刊: ADDICTION
影响因子: 6
作者:
Hajek, P;Gillison, F;McRobbie, H
通讯作者: McRobbie, H