Colorblind and multicultural prejudice reduction strategies in high-conflict situations
Colorblind and multicultural prejudice reduction strategies in high-conflict situations
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1368430208095401
复制
发表时间：
2008-10-01
影响因子：
4.4
通讯作者：
Smith, J. Allegra
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Correll, Joshua;Park, Bernadette;Smith, J. Allegra
我们在低和高种族间冲突的条件下测试了色盲和多元文化偏见减少策略。重复以前的工作，这两种策略都减少了冲突时的偏见。但是当冲突很高时，只有色盲策略减少了偏见（研究1和2）。有趣的是，这种色盲反应似乎反映了抑制。当偏见被更微妙地评估时（使用内隐测量），色盲参与者表现出与多元文化参与者相同的偏见（研究2）。而且，在延迟之后，色盲参与者表现出反弹，表现出比多元文化同行更大的偏见（研究3）。当意识形态被测量而不是被操纵时，也得到了类似的效果（研究4）。我们认为，冲突挑战的原则，一个色盲的意识形态（前提是没有群体差异），但不是那些多元文化的意识形态（承认差异）。
We tested colorblind and multicultural prejudice-reduction strategies under conditions of low and high interethnic conflict. Replicating previous work, both strategies reduced prejudice when conflict was low. But when conflict was high, only the colorblind strategy reduced prejudice (Studies 1 and 2). Interestingly, this colorblind response seemed to reflect suppression. When prejudice was assessed more subtly (with implicit measures), colorblind participants demonstrated bias equivalent to multicultural participants (Study 2). And, after a delay, colorblind participants showed a rebound, demonstrating greater prejudice than their multicultural counterparts (Study 3). Similar effects were obtained when ideology was measured rather than manipulated (Study 4). We suggest that conflict challenges the tenets of a colorblind ideology (predicated on the absence of group differences) but not those of a multicultural ideology (which acknowledges difference).