The development of consistent decision-making across economic domains

The development of consistent decision-making across economic domains
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.geb.2019.05.003
复制
发表时间:
2019-07-01
影响因子:
1.1
通讯作者:
Kodaverdian, Niree
Kodaverdian, Niree
中科院分区:
经济学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Brocas, Isabelle;Carrillo, Juan D.;Kodaverdian, Niree

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

基于价值的推理是如何发展的以及这种发展在不同领域之间有何不同?我们提出了一种新颖的实验设计,让 5 至 11 岁的儿童在商品(玩具)、社交(自我和他人之间共享)和风险(彩票)领域进行成对选择,并评估他们选择的一致性。现有的发展范式(例如传递推理、注意力控制和集中化)无法完全解释跨领域一致性的发展。我们表明,选择一致性与偏好的自我了解有关,这种偏好在不同领域中逐渐且有差异地发展。商品领域提供了一个发展模板:随着时间的推移,孩子们变得更加一致,因为他们学到了自己最喜欢和最不喜欢的东西。在社交领域,孩子们逐渐学习他们最喜欢的东西,而在风险领域,他们逐渐学习他们最不喜欢的东西。这些不对称的发展导致了一致性的不对称模式。 (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. 保留所有权利。
How does value-based reasoning develop and how different this development is from one domain to another? We propose a novel experimental design where children 5 to 11 years old make pairwise choices in the Goods (toys), Social (sharing between self and other), and Risk (lotteries) domains, and we evaluate the consistency of their choices. The development of consistency across domains cannot be fully accounted for by existing developmental paradigms such as transitive reasoning, attentional control and centration. We show that choice consistency is related to self-knowledge of preferences which develops gradually and differentially across domains. The Goods domain offers a developmental template: children become more consistent over time because they learn what they like most and least. In the Social domain, children gradually learn what they like most, while in the Risk domain they gradually learn what they like least. These asymmetric developments give rise to asymmetric patterns of consistency. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.