Comparison Between Manual and Automated Annotations of Eco-Acoustic Recordings Collected in Fukushima Restricted Zone.
Comparison Between Manual and Automated Annotations of Eco-Acoustic Recordings Collected in Fukushima Restricted Zone.
复制标题
福岛限制区收集的生态声学记录的手动和自动注释之间的比较。
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-030-77015-0_12
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Hill Hiroki Kobayashi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Daisuke Shimotoku;Junya Kawase;Herve Glotin;Hill Hiroki Kobayashi
从2016年开始，在福岛禁区内进行长期生态记录，监测生物多样性。在本文中，我们使用简单的骰子指数比较人类注释的鸟类活动与自动鸟类检测记录。结果表明，强烈的差异，就类型的音景。平均而言，人工和自动注释在日出时匹配良好。事实上，它们在夏初的日出时比夏末的日落时更匹配。这种影响可能是由于鸟类歌声的质量随季节和一天中的时间而变化。据我们所知，这是第一次通过在对特定区域（例如福岛禁区）的长期调查中考虑鸟类活动的估计来研究这种影响。
Since 2016, long-term ecological recordings have been conducted in the Fukushima restricted zone to monitor biodiversity. In this paper, we use the simple Dice index to compare the human annotations of bird activities with automatic bird-detection recordings. The results show strong differences with respect to the types of soundscapes. On average, human and automatic annotations matched well at sunrise. In fact, they matched better at sunrise at the start of summer than at sunset at the end of the summer. This effect may be due to the quality of the bird songs that vary with the season and time of the day. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that this effect has been investigated by considering the estimation of bird activities in long-term surveys of specific areas, such as the Fukushima restricted zone.