Grounded Cognition: Past, Present, and Future

Grounded Cognition: Past, Present, and Future
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115.x
复制
发表时间:
2010-10-01
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Barsalou, Lawrence W.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

30年前,扎根认知的理论来源于哲学、知觉、认知语言学、心理语言学、认知心理学和认知神经心理学。在接下来的20年里,扎根认知在这些领域继续发展,并在机器人、认知生态学、认知神经科学和发展心理学中采取了新的形式。在过去的10年里,扎根认知的研究发展迅速,特别是在认知神经科学,社会神经科学,认知心理学,社会心理学和发展心理学。目前,扎根认知似乎在整个认知科学中获得了越来越多的接受,从相对次要的地位转变为越来越重要。然而,研究人员想知道接地机制是否位于认知系统的核心,或者是经典符号机制的外围。尽管在缺乏成熟理论的情况下,接地认知目前主要是由演示实验主导的,但该领域在未来30年内可能会越来越多地由理论驱动。另一个可能的发展是将基础机制越来越多地纳入认知结构和经典认知现象的解释中。随着这种结合的发生,这些架构和现象的许多功能可能会保留下来,沿着许多原始机制。未来的基础认知理论可能会受到认知神经科学和社会神经科学以及发展科学和机器人技术的严重影响。认知科学的三个主要观点经典的符号架构,统计/动力系统和接地认知的方面可能会越来越多地集成在未来的理论,每个捕获智能不可或缺的方面。
Thirty years ago, grounded cognition had roots in philosophy, perception, cognitive linguistics, psycholinguistics, cognitive psychology, and cognitive neuropsychology. During the next 20 years, grounded cognition continued developing in these areas, and it also took new forms in robotics, cognitive ecology, cognitive neuroscience, and developmental psychology. In the past 10 years, research on grounded cognition has grown rapidly, especially in cognitive neuroscience, social neuroscience, cognitive psychology, social psychology, and developmental psychology. Currently, grounded cognition appears to be achieving increased acceptance throughout cognitive science, shifting from relatively minor status to increasing importance. Nevertheless, researchers wonder whether grounded mechanisms lie at the heart of the cognitive system or are peripheral to classic symbolic mechanisms. Although grounded cognition is currently dominated by demonstration experiments in the absence of well-developed theories, the area is likely to become increasingly theory driven over the next 30 years. Another likely development is the increased incorporation of grounding mechanisms into cognitive architectures and into accounts of classic cognitive phenomena. As this incorporation occurs, much functionality of these architectures and phenomena is likely to remain, along with many original mechanisms. Future theories of grounded cognition are likely to be heavily influenced by both cognitive neuroscience and social neuroscience, and also by developmental science and robotics. Aspects from the three major perspectives in cognitive science-classic symbolic architectures, statistical/dynamical systems, and grounded cognition-will probably be integrated increasingly in future theories, each capturing indispensable aspects of intelligence.