Institutional Illegality and Disobedience: Local Government Narratives
Institutional Illegality and Disobedience: Local Government Narratives
复制标题
制度违法和不服从:地方政府的叙述
DOI:
10.1093/ojls/16.2.255
复制
发表时间:
1996
影响因子:
1.2
通讯作者:
Davina Cooper
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Davina Cooper
Municipal defiance conjures up for many the excesses of the 1980s 'loony left'; local socialism gone wild as councils attempted to take on and beat the Thatcher Government. Commentators point to a range of sites upon which such struggles took place: municipal finance, council house sales, equal opportunity policies, education provision, and the privatization of public services.' While not all involved overtly illegal behaviour, their contesting of government policy challenged the authority and legitimacy of constitutionality. Law's impact on municipal government has been explored by writers using paradigms of legalization, juridification, and judicialization.2 This work has been extremely helpful in identifying the changing framework of central-local relations, and in highlighting the impact on local government of new laws, judicial review, and growing constraints on discretion. Less, however, has been said about administrative illegality. When discussed, it tends to be treated as a peripheral, implementation problem-indicative of excessive local discretion-rather than as a significant structuring device in its own right. In this paper, I centre illegality as law's inevitable surplus--expelled, yet always present, constituted at the heart of law, for legality can have no meaning without it. As I explore below, illegality can be seen as the 'feminized other': subjugated, mysterious, and wild, to be mastered, discovered and bared by its masculine