Personality and Menstruation

Personality and Menstruation
复制标题

性格与月经

DOI:
10.1097/00006842-198003000-00002
复制
发表时间:
1980
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
J. Ebie
J. Ebie
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Awaritefe;M. Awaritefe;F. Diejomaoh;J. Ebie

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

患者;本研究尝试将人格与经前紧张(PMT)联系起来,使用两组40名已产妇女和40名已产妇女,分别由20名单身和20名已婚受试者组成,年龄范围为21至30岁。月经指导组与非月经组具有相同的年龄范围和方法。排除对怀孕、使用避孕药具和月经不规律的控制。还研究了公民地位和平等的影响。使用标准的人格和焦虑测量。结果发现:1)月经指导组的状态焦虑得分高于非月经指导组。2)状态焦虑与特质焦虑呈显著正相关。3)生理期组与非生理期组状态焦虑的差异表现为对症状报告的夸大。4)莫兹利人格量表对经期组和非经期组没有区别。5)经前症状检查表的总体得分在经期组和非经期组之间没有区别,但乳房、泌尿和盆腔症状部分有区别。6)婚姻状况和性别平等本身对经期组和非经期组的表现都没有显著影响。
&NA; An attempt was made to relate personality to premenstrual tension (PMT), using two groups of 40 parous and 40 mulliparous women, respectively composed of 20 single and 20 married subjects with an age range of 21 to 30 years. The menstrual instruction group had identical age range and means with the nonmenstrual group. Control for pregnancy, use of contraceptives, and irregularity of periods was by exclusion. The influence of civil status and parity was also examined. Standard measures of personality and anxiety were utilized. It was found that: 1) The menstrual instruction group had higher scores in state anxiety than the nonmenstrual group. 2) State anxiety scores were positively and significantly correlated with trait anxiety scores. 3) The differences in state anxiety between the menstrual and nonmenstrual groups manifested in the form of exaggeration of symptomm reporting. 4) The Maudsley Personality Inventory did not discriminate between our menstrual and nonmenstrual groups. 5) The global scores of the premenstrual sympto checklist did not discriminate between our menstrual and nonmenstrual groups but the sections on breast, urinary, and pelvic symptoms did. 6) Neither marital status nor parity by itself had any significant effect on the performance of our menstrual and nonmenstrual groups.