Education Markets and Social Class Inequality
Education Markets and Social Class Inequality
复制标题
教育市场和社会阶层不平等
DOI：
10.1007/978-1-4020-5916-2_28
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Raffe
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Croxford;D. Raffe
在20世纪80年代和90年代，英国推出了发展教育准市场的政策，类似于当时其他国家推出的政策(赫希1994；惠特耶等人，1998；劳德，休斯等人，1999)。在新右翼和新自由主义的影响下，准市场将市场原则应用于公共服务的提供。它们与“真正的”市场的不同之处在于，所提供的服务对用户是免费的，供应商可能不是私人利润最大化的组织(Le Grand和Bartlett，1993)。教育准市场的典型特征是家长选择学校，公布信息告知这一选择，与入学挂钩的资金，授予学校管理权，相应减少教育当局规划教育的权力，以及鼓励学校多样化。
In the 1980s and 1990s Great Britain introduced policies to develop quasi-markets in education, similar to policies introduced in other countries at that time (Hirsch 1994; Whittyet al., 1998; Lauder, Hugheset al., 1999). Influenced by the New Right and neo-liberalism, quasi-markets apply market principles to the provision of public services. They differ from ‘real’ markets in that the services provided are free to the user and the providers may not be private profit-maximising organisations (Le Grand and Bartlett 1993). The typical features of educational quasi-markets are parental choice of school, the publication of information to inform this choice, enrolment-linked funding, the granting of management powers to schools, the corresponding reduction in the powers of educational authorities to plan education, and encouragement to schools to diversify.