Constructing High-stakes Surgical Decisions It's Better to Die Trying
Constructing High-stakes Surgical Decisions It's Better to Die Trying
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/sla.0000000000001081
复制
发表时间:
2016-01-01
影响因子:
9
通讯作者:
Schwarze, Margaret L.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Nabozny, Michael J.;Kruser, Jacqueline M.;Schwarze, Margaret L.
Objective:To explore high-stakes surgical decision making from the perspective of seniors and surgeons.Background:A majority of older chronically ill patients would decline a low-risk procedure if the outcome was severe functional impairment. However, 25% of Medicare beneficiaries have surgery in their last 3 months of life, which may be inconsistent with their preferences. How patients make decisions to have surgery may contribute to this problem of unwanted care.Methods:We convened 4 focus groups at senior centers and 2 groups of surgeons in Madison and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, where we showed a video about a decision regarding a choice between surgery and palliative care. We used qualitative content analysis to identify themes about communication and explanatory models for end-of-life treatment decisions.Results:Seniors (n=37) and surgeons (n=17) agreed that maximizing quality of life should guide treatment decisions for older patients. However, when faced with an acute choice between surgery and palliative care, seniors viewed this either as a choice between life and death or a decision about how to die. Although surgeons agreed that very frail patients should not have surgery, they held conflicting views about presenting treatment options.Conclusions:Seniors and surgeons highly value quality of life, but this notion is difficult to incorporate in acute surgical decisions. Some seniors use these values to consider a choice between surgery and palliative care, whereas others view this as a simple choice between life and death. Surgeons acknowledge challenges framing decisions and describe a clinical momentum that promotes surgical intervention.