The “Trojan Horse” affair and radicalisation: an analysis of Ofsted reports
The “Trojan Horse” affair and radicalisation: an analysis of Ofsted reports
复制标题
“特洛伊木马”事件与激进化：Ofsted 报告分析
DOI：
10.1080/00131911.2015.1130027
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Imran Mogra
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Imran Mogra
这篇文章分析了激进化一词在21份Ofsted报告中出现的频率，这些报告是在“特洛伊木马”事件后对伯明翰一些学校进行检查后发布的。采用上下文关键词技术来研究其在报告语料库中的使用范围。调查结果显示，没有系统和协调的阴谋来接管这些学校，也没有任何协调一致和刻意的阴谋来推动这些学校或其他地方的穆斯林儿童的激进化和暴力极端主义。一些报告揭示了高级管理人员、州长和地方当局代表在主动回应一些学校提出的关切方面的不足。他们因未能最大限度地利用现有机会，将那些容易被激进化的人的潜在风险降至最低而受到批评。然而，这些发现暴露了一些学校的优势，在这些学校，校董和高级工作人员一直很积极，并拥有良好的当地知识和监控系统。讨论提请注意需要加强治理和伙伴关系，丰富学生的经验。
This article provides an analysis of the frequency with which the word radicalisation appears in 21 Ofsted reports published as a result of inspections carried out in some Birmingham schools following the “Trojan Horse” affair. The technique of key-words-in-context was employed to study the range of its uses in the corpus of the reports. The findings show an absence of a systematic and coordinated plot to take over these schools and an absence of any concerted and deliberate plot to promote radicalisation and violent extremism of Muslim children in these schools or elsewhere. Some reports reveal shortcomings on the part of senior managers, governors and local authority representatives in responding proactively to concerns raised in some schools. They have been criticised for failing to maximise the opportunities available to minimise the potential risks of those vulnerable to being radicalised. However, the findings expose strengths in some schools where governors and senior staff have been proactive and have good local knowledge and monitoring systems in place. The discussion draws attention for the need to strengthen governance and partnerships and enrich pupil experiences.