HOW FAMILIES MANAGE CHRONIC CONDITIONS - AN ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT OF NORMALIZATION
HOW FAMILIES MANAGE CHRONIC CONDITIONS - AN ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT OF NORMALIZATION
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/nur.4770090306
复制
发表时间：
1986-09-01
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
DEATRICK, JA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
KNAFL, KA;DEATRICK, JA
概念分析需要对给定概念的属性或特征进行系统检查，以澄清该概念的含义。 “正常化”一词经常出现在有关家庭如何应对成员疾病或残疾的报告中。虽然大多数作者都同意有生病或残疾成员的家庭试图使他们的家庭生活正常化，但这个概念的定义和应用在不同的调查者中存在很大差异。遵循 Chinn 和 Jacobs (1983) 提出的概念分析指南，追溯了概念正常化的起源和发展，并提出了区分正常化和家庭对成员疾病或残疾做出的其他反应的标准。提供了三个案例：模型（规范化）案例、相反（分离）案例和相关（否认）案例。
Concept analysis entails the systematic examination of the attributes or characteristics of a given concept for the purpose of clarifying the meaning of that concept. The term “normalization” appears frequently in reports of how families respond to the illness or disability of a member. While most authors agree that families who have an ill or disabled member attempt to normalize their family life, definitions and applications of the concept vary considerably across investigators. Following guidelines for concept analysis proposed by Chinn and Jacobs (1983), the origin and development of the concept normalization are traced and criteria are presented for distinguishing between normalization and other responses families make to a member's illness or disability. Three case examples are presented: a model (normalization) case, a contrary (disassociation) case, and a related (denial) case.