Instrumental or intrinsic? Cultural policy in Scotland since devolution
Instrumental or intrinsic? Cultural policy in Scotland since devolution
复制标题
工具性还是内在性？
DOI：
10.1080/09548960802615430
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Joanne Orr
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Joanne Orr
这是一篇关于权力下放以来苏格兰文化政策变化的评论文章，介绍了过去10年苏格兰文化政策的发展情况。利用内在政策和工具政策的定义分析了文化政策的变化。本文从与苏格兰中央政府和文化服务提供商合作的文化机构的角度进行分析。在权力下放期间，出现了一些政策转变，最显著的变化是从工党政府发展文化权利的方法，到新政府为政府所有部门和所有公共机构制定国家绩效框架。这个新的“框架”关注的是结果和目标，新政府正在寻求各方的一致，以实现其实现“可持续经济增长”的核心目标。这一政策变化似乎表明，在文化政策中，从试图考虑文化的内在价值向工具性方法转变。目前尚不清楚的是，国家绩效框架的基于结果的方法在其设计中似乎很有帮助，但在其实施中是否允许隐含文化的内在价值。
An opinion piece on cultural policy changes in Scotland since devolution, presenting a view of the development of cultural policy in Scotland over the last 10 years. The changes in cultural policy are analysed using the definitions of intrinsic and instrumental policy. Analysis is presented from the perspective of a cultural agency working with both central government in Scotland and cultural service providers. Over the period of devolution there has been some policy shifts most notably the recent change from the Labour administration's approach of developing cultural entitlements, to the new administration's development of a National Performance Framework for all parts of government and all public bodies. This new “Framework” has a focus on outcomes and targets and the new government is seeking alignment from all to progress its core purpose of achieving “sustainable economic growth”. This policy change appears to denote a shift from attempting to take account of the intrinsic value of culture in cultural policy to an instrumental approach. What is not clear is if the outcome based approach of the National Performance Framework which appears instrumental in its design will in its implementation allow for the intrinsic value of culture to be implicit.