The Dash for Gas
The Dash for Gas
复制标题
冲刺加油
DOI：
10.1080/1461670x.2016.1181528
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
S. Kiousis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Neil;T. Schweickart;Tianduo Zhang;Josephine Lukito;J. Y. Kim;Guy J. Golan;S. Kiousis
水力压裂法是从地下深处的页岩层中提取天然气和石油储量的过程。这一过程最初在英国得到了公众的支持，此后成为一个高度争议的问题，主要在政府、行业和反水力压裂倡导团体之间进行辩论。本研究通过采用“话语建构”的三个层面（对象、属性和网络联系）作为理论透镜，考察了2012 - 2014年间英国这些利益相关者群体与国家新闻媒体之间的政治话语。总共对1354条独特的信息进行了编码，分析了840条信息补贴和514条新闻媒体内容。为了确定建筑业的短期、中期和长期影响，进行了时间滞后分析。结果表明，对所有三个层次的网络建设提供了坚实的支持。我们的研究结果表明，反水力压裂倡导团体在所有三个时间段内都更成功地影响了新闻媒体内容，此外还支持数字信息补贴的影响力日益增长，作为一种有效的工具，以实现战略目标。这些研究结果的理论和实践意义进行了讨论。
Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is the process of extracting reserves of natural gas and oil from shale formations deep underground. This process, initially met with public support in the United Kingdom, has since become a highly contentious issue primarily debated between government, industry, and anti-fracking advocacy groups. Through the employment of three levels of agenda-building as a theoretical lens of examination (object, attribute, and network connections), this study investigated the political discourse between these stakeholder groups and national news media in the United Kingdom between 2012 and 2014. In total, 1354 unique messages were coded, with 840 information subsidies and 514 news media content analyzed. To determine the short-, mid-, and long-term effects of agenda-building, a time-lag analysis was conducted. The results suggest solid support for all three levels of agenda-building. Our findings indicate that anti-fracking advocacy groups were more successful at influencing news media content across all three time periods, in addition to supporting the growing influence of digital information subsidies as an effective tool for agenda-building strategies. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.