Informativeness ratings of messages created on an AAC processing prosthesis.
Informativeness ratings of messages created on an AAC processing prosthesis.
复制标题
在 AAC 处理假体上创建的消息的信息性评级。
DOI：
10.1080/02687030601154167
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Linebarger,Marcia
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bartlett,MeganR;Fink,RuthB;Schwartz,MyrnaF;Linebarger,Marcia
背景：SentenceShaper™（SSR）是一种计算机程序，其通过记录和存储用户对麦克风说话的片段来支持失语症中的口语产生，使它们可用于回放并允许它们被组合并整合到更大的结构中（即，句子和叙述）。先前的一项研究测量了在有和没有SentenceShaper帮助的情况下产生的故事情节叙述中的话语长度和语法复杂性，证明了一些失语症患者的“辅助效果”，这意味着在这种沟通辅助的支持下产生的叙述的优势（Linebarger，Schwartz，罗马尼亚，Kohn，& Stephens，）。本研究偏离了Linebarger等人的研究。目的：目的是（1）从第一人称的角度展示在“功能性叙述”中的辅助效果，“功能性叙述”传达假设的真实的生活情景;（2）首次将辅助和自发的语音样本提交给听者进行信息判断;以及（3）产生关于特定主题从SentenceShaper结转的初步证据，即，方法和程序：五个患有慢性失语症的个体在三种条件下创建了关于两个主题的叙述：无辅助（U）、辅助（SSR）和后SSR无辅助（Post‐U）。30个样本（5名参与者，2个主题，3个条件）被随机分配，并由语言病理学研究生判断信息量。评分方法为直接量值估计（DME）。结果与结果：重复测量方差分析进行DME评分为每个参与者在每个主题。一个主要的影响条件是目前的五个参与者中的四个，对一个或两个主题。计划的对比显示，辅助效果（SSR > U）是显着的，在这些情况下。对于两个参与者，也有特定主题的结转（后U > U）。结论：听众判断功能性叙述产生的句子Shaper比可比的叙述自发地说更多的信息。这扩展了SentenceShaper辅助效果的证据。也有证据表明，尽管较弱，特定主题的结转，这表明该计划可能被有效地用于练习即将到来的面对面的互动。
Background:SentenceShaper™(SSR) is a computer program that supports spoken language production in aphasia by recording and storing the fragments that the user speaks into the microphone, making them available for playback and allowing them to be combined and integrated into larger structures (i.e., sentences and narratives). A prior study that measured utterance length and grammatical complexity in story‐plot narratives produced with and without the aid ofSentenceShaperdemonstrated an “aided effect” in some speakers with aphasia, meaning an advantage for the narratives that were produced with the support of this communication aid (Linebarger, Schwartz, Romania, Kohn, & Stephens, ). The present study deviated from Linebarger et al.'s methods in key respects and again showed aided effects ofSentenceShaperin persons with aphasia.Aims: Aims were (1) to demonstrate aided effects in “functional narratives” conveying hypothetical real‐life situations from a first person perspective; (2) for the first time, to submit aided and spontaneous speech samples to listener judgements of informativeness; and (3) to produce preliminary evidence on topic‐specific carryover fromSentenceShaper, i.e., carryover from an aided production to a subsequent unaided production on the same topic.Methods & Procedures: Five individuals with chronic aphasia created narratives on two topics, under three conditions: Unaided (U), Aided (SSR), and Post‐SSR Unaided (Post‐U). The 30 samples (5 participants, 2 topics, 3 conditions) were randomised and judged for informativeness by graduate students in speech‐language pathology. The method for rating was Direct Magnitude Estimation (DME).Outcomes & Results: Repeated measures ANOVAs were performed on DME ratings for each participant on each topic. A main effect of Condition was present for four of the five participants, on one or both topics. Planned contrasts revealed that the aided effect (SSR > U) was significant in each of these cases. For two participants, there was also topic‐specific carryover (Post‐U > U).Conclusions: Listeners judged functional narratives generated onSentenceShaperto be more informative than comparable narratives spoken spontaneously. This extends the evidence for aided effects ofSentenceShaper. There was also evidence, albeit weaker, for topic‐specific carryover, suggesting that the program might be used effectively to practise for upcoming face‐to‐face interactions.